Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936076AbcLOOID (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:08:03 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:35184 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757846AbcLOOH4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:07:56 -0500 From: Michal Hocko To: , Cc: Andrew Morton , Dave Chinner , "Theodore Ts'o" , Chris Mason , David Sterba , Jan Kara , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, logfs@logfs.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, LKML , Michal Hocko Subject: [PATCH 5/9] xfs: use memalloc_nofs_{save,restore} instead of memalloc_noio* Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:07:11 +0100 Message-Id: <20161215140715.12732-6-mhocko@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.10.2 In-Reply-To: <20161215140715.12732-1-mhocko@kernel.org> References: <20161215140715.12732-1-mhocko@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2801 Lines: 84 From: Michal Hocko kmem_zalloc_large and _xfs_buf_map_pages use memalloc_noio_{save,restore} API to prevent from reclaim recursion into the fs because vmalloc can invoke unconditional GFP_KERNEL allocations and these functions might be called from the NOFS contexts. The memalloc_noio_save will enforce GFP_NOIO context which is even weaker than GFP_NOFS and that seems to be unnecessary. Let's use memalloc_nofs_{save,restore} instead as it should provide exactly what we need here - implicit GFP_NOFS context. Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko --- fs/xfs/kmem.c | 10 +++++----- fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/kmem.c b/fs/xfs/kmem.c index a76a05dae96b..d69ed5e76621 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/kmem.c +++ b/fs/xfs/kmem.c @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ kmem_alloc(size_t size, xfs_km_flags_t flags) void * kmem_zalloc_large(size_t size, xfs_km_flags_t flags) { - unsigned noio_flag = 0; + unsigned nofs_flag = 0; void *ptr; gfp_t lflags; @@ -80,14 +80,14 @@ kmem_zalloc_large(size_t size, xfs_km_flags_t flags) * context via PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO to prevent memory reclaim re-entering * the filesystem here and potentially deadlocking. */ - if ((current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS) || (flags & KM_NOFS)) - noio_flag = memalloc_noio_save(); + if (flags & KM_NOFS) + nofs_flag = memalloc_nofs_save(); lflags = kmem_flags_convert(flags); ptr = __vmalloc(size, lflags | __GFP_HIGHMEM | __GFP_ZERO, PAGE_KERNEL); - if ((current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS) || (flags & KM_NOFS)) - memalloc_noio_restore(noio_flag); + if (flags & KM_NOFS) + memalloc_nofs_restore(nofs_flag); return ptr; } diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c index f31ae592dcae..5c6f9bd4d8be 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c @@ -441,17 +441,17 @@ _xfs_buf_map_pages( bp->b_addr = NULL; } else { int retried = 0; - unsigned noio_flag; + unsigned nofs_flag; /* * vm_map_ram() will allocate auxillary structures (e.g. * pagetables) with GFP_KERNEL, yet we are likely to be under * GFP_NOFS context here. Hence we need to tell memory reclaim - * that we are in such a context via PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO to prevent + * that we are in such a context via PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS to prevent * memory reclaim re-entering the filesystem here and * potentially deadlocking. */ - noio_flag = memalloc_noio_save(); + nofs_flag = memalloc_nofs_save(); do { bp->b_addr = vm_map_ram(bp->b_pages, bp->b_page_count, -1, PAGE_KERNEL); @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ _xfs_buf_map_pages( break; vm_unmap_aliases(); } while (retried++ <= 1); - memalloc_noio_restore(noio_flag); + memalloc_noio_restore(nofs_flag); if (!bp->b_addr) return -ENOMEM; -- 2.10.2