From: Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appana.durga.rao@xilinx.com>
To: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>,
        "dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>
CC: Carlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        "Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] dmaengine: xilinx_dma: Add support for multiple buffers
Thread-Topic: [PATCH] dmaengine: xilinx_dma: Add support for multiple buffers
Thread-Index: AQHSVuB3HZlrbhH/n06PoiH2X9+446EJH2Vw
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:19:58 +0000
Message-ID: <C246CAC1457055469EF09E3A7AC4E11A4A65C899@XAP-PVEXMBX01.xlnx.xilinx.com>
References: <40ba7c24927eeffdcc66425f8ca1203589276c08.1481812291.git.joabreu@synopsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <40ba7c24927eeffdcc66425f8ca1203589276c08.1481812291.git.joabreu@synopsys.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:99
SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Dec 2016 15:20:05.3335
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c;Ip=[149.199.60.100];Helo=[xsj-pvapsmtpgw02]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR02MB2271
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.home.local id uBFFKHbJ014038
Content-Length: 7205
Lines: 235

Hi Jose Abreu,

	Thanks for the patch...

> 
> Xilinx VDMA supports multiple framebuffers. This patch adds correct handling for
> the scenario where multiple framebuffers are available in the HW and parking
> mode is not set.
> 
> We corrected these situations:
> 	1) Do not start VDMA until all the framebuffers
> 	have been programmed with a valid address.
> 	2) Restart variables when VDMA halts/resets.
> 	3) Halt channel when all the framebuffers have
> 	finished and there is not anymore segments
> 	pending.
> 	4) Do not try to overlap framebuffers until they
> 	are completed.
> 
> All these situations, without this patch, can lead to data corruption and even
> system memory corruption. If, for example, user has a VDMA with 3
> framebuffers, with direction DMA_DEV_TO_MEM and user only submits one
> segment, VDMA will write first to the segment the user submitted BUT if the
> user doesn't submit another segment in a timelly manner then VDMA will write
> to position 0 of system mem in the following VSYNC.

	I have posted different patch series for fixing these issues just now...
Please take a look into it...

Regards,
Kedar.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>
> Cc: Carlos Palminha <palminha@synopsys.com>
> Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Kedareswara rao Appana <appana.durga.rao@xilinx.com>
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> ------
>  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.c b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.c
> index 8288fe4..30eec5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.c
> @@ -351,10 +351,12 @@ struct xilinx_dma_chan {
>  	bool cyclic;
>  	bool genlock;
>  	bool err;
> +	bool running;
>  	struct tasklet_struct tasklet;
>  	struct xilinx_vdma_config config;
>  	bool flush_on_fsync;
>  	u32 desc_pendingcount;
> +	u32 seg_pendingcount;
>  	bool ext_addr;
>  	u32 desc_submitcount;
>  	u32 residue;
> @@ -946,6 +948,17 @@ static bool xilinx_dma_is_idle(struct xilinx_dma_chan
> *chan)  }
> 
>  /**
> + * xilinx_vdma_is_multi_buffer - Check if VDMA has multiple
> +framebuffers
> + * @chan: Driver specific DMA channel
> + *
> + * Return: '1' if is multi buffer, '0' if not.
> + */
> +static bool xilinx_vdma_is_multi_buffer(struct xilinx_dma_chan *chan) {
> +	return chan->num_frms > 1;
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * xilinx_dma_halt - Halt DMA channel
>   * @chan: Driver specific DMA channel
>   */
> @@ -966,6 +979,10 @@ static void xilinx_dma_halt(struct xilinx_dma_chan
> *chan)
>  			chan, dma_ctrl_read(chan,
> XILINX_DMA_REG_DMASR));
>  		chan->err = true;
>  	}
> +
> +	chan->seg_pendingcount = 0;
> +	chan->desc_submitcount = 0;
> +	chan->running = false;
>  }
> 
>  /**
> @@ -1002,14 +1019,35 @@ static void xilinx_vdma_start_transfer(struct
> xilinx_dma_chan *chan)
>  	struct xilinx_dma_tx_descriptor *desc, *tail_desc;
>  	u32 reg;
>  	struct xilinx_vdma_tx_segment *tail_segment;
> +	bool mbf = xilinx_vdma_is_multi_buffer(chan) && !config->park;
> 
>  	/* This function was invoked with lock held */
>  	if (chan->err)
>  		return;
> 
> -	if (list_empty(&chan->pending_list))
> +	/*
> +	 * Can't continue if we have already consumed all the available
> +	 * framebuffers and they are not done yet.
> +	 */
> +	if (mbf && (chan->seg_pendingcount >= chan->num_frms))
>  		return;
> 
> +	if (list_empty(&chan->pending_list)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Can't keep running if there are no pending segments. Halt
> +		 * the channel as security measure. Notice that this will not
> +		 * corrupt current transactions because this function is
> +		 * called after the pendingcount is decreased and after the
> +		 * current transaction has finished.
> +		 */
> +		if (mbf && chan->running && !chan->seg_pendingcount) {
> +			dev_dbg(chan->dev, "pending list empty: halting\n");
> +			xilinx_dma_halt(chan);
> +		}
> +
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	desc = list_first_entry(&chan->pending_list,
>  				struct xilinx_dma_tx_descriptor, node);
>  	tail_desc = list_last_entry(&chan->pending_list,
> @@ -1079,6 +1117,8 @@ static void xilinx_vdma_start_transfer(struct
> xilinx_dma_chan *chan)
>  	if (chan->has_sg) {
>  		dma_ctrl_write(chan, XILINX_DMA_REG_TAILDESC,
>  				tail_segment->phys);
> +		list_splice_tail_init(&chan->pending_list, &chan->active_list);
> +		chan->desc_pendingcount = 0;
>  	} else {
>  		struct xilinx_vdma_tx_segment *segment, *last = NULL;
>  		int i = 0;
> @@ -1097,29 +1137,34 @@ static void xilinx_vdma_start_transfer(struct
> xilinx_dma_chan *chan)
> 
> 	XILINX_VDMA_REG_START_ADDRESS(i++),
>  					segment->hw.buf_addr);
> 
> +			chan->seg_pendingcount++;
>  			last = segment;
>  		}
> 
>  		if (!last)
>  			return;
> 
> -		/* HW expects these parameters to be same for one
> transaction */
> -		vdma_desc_write(chan, XILINX_DMA_REG_HSIZE, last-
> >hw.hsize);
> -		vdma_desc_write(chan, XILINX_DMA_REG_FRMDLY_STRIDE,
> -				last->hw.stride);
> -		vdma_desc_write(chan, XILINX_DMA_REG_VSIZE, last-
> >hw.vsize);
> -	}
> -
> -	if (!chan->has_sg) {
>  		list_del(&desc->node);
>  		list_add_tail(&desc->node, &chan->active_list);
>  		chan->desc_submitcount++;
>  		chan->desc_pendingcount--;
>  		if (chan->desc_submitcount == chan->num_frms)
>  			chan->desc_submitcount = 0;
> -	} else {
> -		list_splice_tail_init(&chan->pending_list, &chan->active_list);
> -		chan->desc_pendingcount = 0;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Can't start until all the framebuffers have been programmed
> +		 * or else corruption can occur.
> +		 */
> +		if (mbf && !chan->running &&
> +		   (chan->seg_pendingcount < chan->num_frms))
> +			return;
> +
> +		/* HW expects these parameters to be same for one
> transaction */
> +		vdma_desc_write(chan, XILINX_DMA_REG_HSIZE, last-
> >hw.hsize);
> +		vdma_desc_write(chan, XILINX_DMA_REG_FRMDLY_STRIDE,
> +				last->hw.stride);
> +		vdma_desc_write(chan, XILINX_DMA_REG_VSIZE, last-
> >hw.vsize);
> +		chan->running = true;
>  	}
>  }
> 
> @@ -1327,12 +1372,20 @@ static void xilinx_dma_issue_pending(struct
> dma_chan *dchan)  static void xilinx_dma_complete_descriptor(struct
> xilinx_dma_chan *chan)  {
>  	struct xilinx_dma_tx_descriptor *desc, *next;
> +	struct xilinx_vdma_tx_segment *segment;
> 
>  	/* This function was invoked with lock held */
>  	if (list_empty(&chan->active_list))
>  		return;
> 
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, next, &chan->active_list, node) {
> +		if (chan->xdev->dma_config->dmatype == XDMA_TYPE_VDMA)
> {
> +			list_for_each_entry(segment, &desc->segments, node)
> {
> +				if (chan->seg_pendingcount > 0)
> +					chan->seg_pendingcount--;
> +			}
> +		}
> +
>  		list_del(&desc->node);
>  		if (!desc->cyclic)
>  			dma_cookie_complete(&desc->async_tx);
> @@ -1366,6 +1419,9 @@ static int xilinx_dma_reset(struct xilinx_dma_chan
> *chan)
>  	}
> 
>  	chan->err = false;
> +	chan->seg_pendingcount = 0;
> +	chan->desc_submitcount = 0;
> +	chan->running = false;
> 
>  	return err;
>  }
> --
> 1.9.1
>