Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759609AbcLPIqP (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2016 03:46:15 -0500 Received: from mail-oi0-f65.google.com ([209.85.218.65]:33990 "EHLO mail-oi0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753951AbcLPIqN (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2016 03:46:13 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <32235fb3-0d54-211d-28f4-4655e4bc7812@linux.intel.com> References: <1481306510-7471-1-git-send-email-irina.tirdea@intel.com> <1481306510-7471-2-git-send-email-irina.tirdea@intel.com> <20161213232524.GQ5423@codeaurora.org> <32235fb3-0d54-211d-28f4-4655e4bc7812@linux.intel.com> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:46:11 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v6 1/3] clk: x86: Add Atom PMC platform clocks To: Pierre-Louis Bossart Cc: Stephen Boyd , ALSA Development Mailing List , Irina Tirdea , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Michael Turquette , "x86@kernel.org" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Takashi Iwai , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , Ingo Molnar , Mark Brown , "H. Peter Anvin" , Darren Hart , Thomas Gleixner , Len Brown , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Pierre-Louis Bossart Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1388 Lines: 40 On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > can you elaborate on the last comment? Please don't do top posting. >>> devm_kasprintf() >> >> Please no. That's why I used modal verb "might" instead of "would". >> It's all local to this function, devm isn't helping anything. >> Having one kfree() would be good though. And using init.name for >> the clkdev lookup is probably wrong and should be replaced with >> something more generic along with an associated device name. > > I am not sure I understand this last comment. > init.name is not a constant, it's made of the "pmc_plt_clk_" string > concatenated with an id which directly maps to which hardware clock is > registered. Clients use devm_clk_get() with a "pmc_plt_clk_" argument. Giving more thoughts about design and use of this I would propose to do the following. 1. Create under clock framework something like clk-pmc-atom clock driver (see, for example, clk-fractional-divider, though this one should indeed go under x86 folder). 2. In real provider, i.e. pmc_atom, create the necessary clock tree with *names*. Scheme with ID is fragile, imagine another version of PMC where ordering would be mixed up? It's not hypothetical since we used to have this already in pmc_atom for some registers and bits. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko