Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760047AbcLPJ0I (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2016 04:26:08 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38116 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754763AbcLPJ0A (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2016 04:26:00 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] powerpc/kvm: Reserve capabilities and ioctls for HPT resizing To: David Gibson , paulus@samba.org References: <20161215055404.29351-1-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> <20161215055404.29351-2-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Cc: michael@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, lvivier@redhat.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <25bcced1-4903-2cf7-6a56-14c3ced5cd28@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:25:55 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161215055404.29351-2-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Fri, 16 Dec 2016 09:26:00 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1365 Lines: 25 On 15.12.2016 06:53, David Gibson wrote: > This adds a new powerpc-specific KVM_CAP_SPAPR_RESIZE_HPT capability to > advertise whether KVM is capable of handling the PAPR extensions for > resizing the hashed page table during guest runtime. > > At present, HPT resizing is possible with KVM PR without kernel > modification, since the HPT is managed within qemu. It's not possible yet > with KVM HV, because the HPT is managed by KVM. At present, qemu has to > use other capabilities which (by accident) reveal whether PR or HV is in > use to know if it can advertise HPT resizing capability to the guest. > > To avoid ambiguity with existing kernels, the encoding is a bit odd. > 0 means "unknown" since that's what previous kernels will return > 1 means "HPT resize possible if available if and only if the HPT is allocated in > userspace, rather than in the kernel". Userspace can check > KVM_CAP_PPC_ALLOC_HTAB to determine if that's the case. In practice > this will give the same results as userspace's fallback check. > 2 will mean "HPT resize available and implemented via ioctl()s > KVM_PPC_RESIZE_HPT_PREPARE and KVM_PPC_RESIZE_HPT_COMMIT" This encoding IMHO clearly needs some proper documentation in Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt ... and maybe also some dedicated #defines in an uapi header file. Thomas