Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759267AbcLPT2y (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2016 14:28:54 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.83.53]:36245 "EHLO mail-pg0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753969AbcLPT2o (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2016 14:28:44 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:28:39 -0800 From: Bjorn Andersson To: loic pallardy Cc: Sarangdhar Joshi , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Santosh Shilimkar , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Dave Gerlach , Suman Anna , Stephen Boyd , Trilok Soni Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Remove firmware_loading_complete Message-ID: <20161216192839.GT3439@tuxbot> References: <1481846632-4778-1-git-send-email-spjoshi@codeaurora.org> <1481846632-4778-2-git-send-email-spjoshi@codeaurora.org> <948b5b23-9440-00ef-7cf9-eca62ea93165@st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <948b5b23-9440-00ef-7cf9-eca62ea93165@st.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1937 Lines: 53 On Fri 16 Dec 00:26 PST 2016, loic pallardy wrote: > > > On 12/16/2016 01:03 AM, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote: > >rproc_del() waits on firmware_loading_complete in order to > >make sure rproc_add() completed successfully before calling > >rproc_shutdown(). However since rproc_add() will always be > >called before rproc_del(), we do not need to wait on > >firmware_loading_complete. Drop this completion variable > >altogether. > > > Hi, > > firmware_loading_complete is used to synchronize all operations on rproc > with parallel work launched by request_firmware_nowait. We had a deadlock scenario in this code, where a call to rproc_boot() would grab the rproc mutex and the request_firmware_nowait() callback would wait on this lock before it would signal the completion that the rproc_boot() was waiting for. As the request_firmware_nowait() doesn't do anything other than handle auto_boot and signal the completion - and there is an internal sleep mechanism for handling concurrent request_firmware calls - I posted a patch and dropped the rproc_boot() wait thing. > rproc_add could be done and firmware loading still pending. In that case > rproc_del mustn't be called before end of the procedure. You're right. We might have an outstanding request_firmware_nowait() when we hit rproc_del() and we might free the underlaying rproc context. Holding a reference over the request_firmware_nowait() would solve this, but would cause issues if we get a rproc_add() from the same driver (e.g. after module unload/load) before the firmware timer has fired - and released the resources. This issue could be remedied by moving the rproc_delete_debug_dir() to rproc_del() and aim for not having any objects exposed outside the remoteproc core once rproc_del() returns. > > If you decide to remove this synchronization you need either to modify rproc > boot sequence or to replace it by something else. > I agree. Regards, Bjorn