Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263894AbTEOIuU (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2003 04:50:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263897AbTEOIuU (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2003 04:50:20 -0400 Received: from meryl.it.uu.se ([130.238.12.42]:48124 "EHLO meryl.it.uu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263894AbTEOIuS (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2003 04:50:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16067.22472.306565.803037@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:03:04 +0200 From: mikpe@csd.uu.se To: Rene Rebe Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: APIC error In-Reply-To: <20030514.221858.846957347.rene.rebe@gmx.net> References: <20030513.213112.184808431.rene.rebe@gmx.net> <16066.15561.296849.757291@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20030514.221858.846957347.rene.rebe@gmx.net> X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under Emacs 20.7.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1582 Lines: 37 Rene Rebe writes: > HI, > > On: Wed, 14 May 2003 14:55:37 +0200, > mikpe@csd.uu.se wrote: > > > > Those errors only seem to happen during high disk-io (SCSI or IDE). > > > What specific meaning do those errors have? Are they dangerous? > > > > They are defined in Intel's IA32 manual set, volume 3, > > "System Programming Guide", downloadable from developer.intel.com. > > > > These errors mean that APIC bus messages are lost or have checksum errors. > > You don't say which kernel you're using or which chipset, but chances are > > your mobo's APIC bus is noisy. > > > > > Each CPU survives hours in memtest86 ... And with maxcpus=1 it also > > > does not seem to happen ... The BIOS is latest. > > > > You can try booting with "noapic", that should let you keep using SMP > > while avoiding your possibly buggy APIC bus. > > Thanks for the anwer I googled for this before the mail but only found > much noise ... I'll triy noapic (I thought this would disable SMP, > too), but I already had to notice that with maxcpus=1 I also get some > few APIC errors. > > Is there drawback in using noapic in SMP mode? No load balancing of I/O interrupts since they will all be directed to CPU 0 only. Unless your dual P5 is servicing a lot of interrupts, I doubt it will make a noticeable difference. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/