Message-Id: <58593997020000F9001B859F@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:00:55 -0700
From: "Gang He" <ghe@suse.com>
To: <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: <kbuild-all@01.org>, <jlbec@evilplan.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        <ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com>, <mfasheh@versity.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=AD=94=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9A=20Re:=20[kbuild-all]=20?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=AD=94=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9A=20Re:=20[PATCH=201/2]=20ocfs2:=20a?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?dd=20kobject=20for=20online=20file=20check?=
References: <1482139287-19040-2-git-send-email-ghe@suse.com>
 <201612191811.4gtVVyNv%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
 <58592784020000F9001B856C@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
 <20161220014713.zf2ksqzeb7tz75gw@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20161220014713.zf2ksqzeb7tz75gw@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 650
Lines: 23

Hi Fengguang and all,
I will reconstruct my patch set, to make sure each patch can follow this rule.

Thanks
Gang 

>>> Fengguang Wu <lkp@intel.com> 2016-12-20 上午 9:47 >>>
Hi Gang,

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 06:43:48PM -0700, Gang He wrote:
>Hello Kbuild,
>Could you build my whole patch set (2 patch)? I think that the code is OK.

We test your whole patch as well as first-N patches, and noticed that
the first-1 patch breaks bisectibility:

>Note: the linux-review/Gang-He/ocfs2-add-kobject-for-online-file-check/20161219-181858 HEAD 6ef9256cd25ef72a5e69490cc3dacde95b8e2ac4 builds fine.
>      It only hurts bisectibility.

Thanks,
Fengguang