MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxVzes5Jt-hC9BLVSb99x6K-_WkLO-_JTvCjhf5wuK_4w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20161219225826.F8CB356F@viggo.jf.intel.com> <CA+55aFwK6JdSy9v_BkNYWNdfK82sYA1h3qCSAJQ0T45cOxeXmQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <156a5b34-ad3b-d0aa-83c9-109b366c1bdf@linux.intel.com> <CA+55aFxVzes5Jt-hC9BLVSb99x6K-_WkLO-_JTvCjhf5wuK_4w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 10:02:46 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwy6+ya_E8N3DFbrq2XjbDs8LWe=W_qW8awimbxw26bJw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] make global bitlock waitqueues per-node
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 418
Lines: 13

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> I'll go back and try to see why the page flag contention patch didn't
> get applied.

Ahh, a combination of warring patches by Nick and PeterZ, and worry
about the page flag bits.

Damn. I had mentally marked this whole issue as "solved". But the fact
that we know how to solve it doesn't mean it's done.

               Linus