Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:32:27 -0700
From: Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>
To: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IRQ and resource for platform_device
Message-ID: <20030515113227.D7685@home.com>
References: <20030515145920.B31491@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20030515090350.A7685@home.com> <20030515173052.C31491@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20030515103513.B7685@home.com> <20030515191336.E31491@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20030515191336.E31491@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>; from rmk@arm.linux.org.uk on Thu, May 15, 2003 at 07:13:36PM +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 791
Lines: 24

On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 07:13:36PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:35:13AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
> > I think having an array of irqs and resources of max count 8 should
> > do it for now.
> > 
> > No matter what we choose, the hardware designers will screw it up
> > eventually.
> 
> Hmm, how would people feel if I suggested just:
> 
> 	int num_resources;
> 	struct resource	*resources;
> 
> We have an IORESOURCE_IRQ, which can be used to indicate IRQ
> resources.

I like that approach...simple and flexible.

-Matt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/