Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934802AbcLUIJo (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 03:09:44 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:60150 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934054AbcLUIJj (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 03:09:39 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:09:31 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Dave Hansen , Bob Peterson , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Steven Whitehouse , Andrew Lutomirski , Andreas Gruenbacher , Mel Gorman , linux-mm Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] make global bitlock waitqueues per-node Message-ID: <20161221080931.GQ3124@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20161219225826.F8CB356F@viggo.jf.intel.com> <156a5b34-ad3b-d0aa-83c9-109b366c1bdf@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 611 Lines: 16 On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:02:46AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > > > I'll go back and try to see why the page flag contention patch didn't > > get applied. > > Ahh, a combination of warring patches by Nick and PeterZ, and worry > about the page flag bits. I think Nick actually had a patch freeing up a pageflag, although Hugh had a comment on that. That said, I'm not a huge fan of his waiters patch, I'm still not sure why he wants to write another whole wait loop, but whatever. Whichever you prefer I suppose.