Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S938905AbcLVJii (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2016 04:38:38 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56948 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758914AbcLVJif (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2016 04:38:35 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:38:28 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andrew Morton , Dave Chinner , "Theodore Ts'o" , Chris Mason , David Sterba , Jan Kara , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, logfs@logfs.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, LKML , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9 v2] scope GFP_NOFS api Message-ID: <20161222093828.GF6048@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20161215140715.12732-1-mhocko@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161215140715.12732-1-mhocko@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 363 Lines: 12 Are there any objections to the approach and can we have this merged to the mm tree? Dave has expressed the patch2 should be dropped for now. I will do that in a next submission but I do not want to resubmit until there is a consensus on this. What do other than xfs/ext4 developers think about this API. Can we find a way to use it? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs