Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 00:47:07 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
To: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mbligh@aracnet.com
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK AIM9] Regressions in 2.5.69
Message-Id: <20030516004707.140b8b11.akpm@digeo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030505211942.1606.qmail@linuxmail.org>
References: <20030505211942.1606.qmail@linuxmail.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 878
Lines: 29

"Paolo Ciarrocchi" <ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all/Andrew/Martin,
>  I noticed regression in a few tests,
>  I deleted the results of tests that don't show differences between the two kernel version.
> 
>  Hope it helps.
> 
>  Ciao,
>  		Paolo
>  		
>  2.5.67
>  2.5.69
> 
>  creat-clo 10010 86.8132        86813.19 File Creations and Closes/second
>  creat-clo 10030 22.0339        22033.90 File Creations and Closes/second
>  ^^^^BIG REGRESSION

I cannot repeat any of this.  In fact 2.5.69-mm is a bit faster than
2.5.67.

I tested ext2 mainly.  But a spot-check of creat-clo on reiserfs showed
no regression either.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/