Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760636AbcLWMLA (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Dec 2016 07:11:00 -0500 Received: from mail-qk0-f193.google.com ([209.85.220.193]:34175 "EHLO mail-qk0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755080AbcLWMK6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Dec 2016 07:10:58 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161223031942.jrgjt567m6bdeke3@lostoracle.net> References: <20161212072541.28435-1-nick.desaulniers@gmail.com> <20161212085620.GA738@amd> <20161212175654.ydc7rx3edqoacnp7@lostoracle.net> <1481567955.1764.28.camel@perches.com> <20161212222216.GA18201@amd> <20161212232043.vc5alwqzvspg2ade@lostoracle.net> <1481584942.29291.9.camel@perches.com> <20161213190001.GA8676@amd> <20161223031942.jrgjt567m6bdeke3@lostoracle.net> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 13:10:56 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: u7SzJfHzRymkJKupKKL83N68qLM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: small formatting fixes To: Nick Desaulniers Cc: Pavel Machek , Joe Perches , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , Linux PM , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1107 Lines: 25 On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:00:01PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: >> Actually.. the ACPI cleanup is fine. You did well :-). >> Pavel > > Cool, so (forgive the naive question) what happens next? Maybe I'm too > used to the immediate gratification from Github of having a Pull Request > get merged. Is this something that you have cherry picked into your > tree, then will ask Linus to pull from at the end of the merge window? > > Do you have a tree that public that I am able to view? On > git.kernel.org, there seems to be one tree with your name on it but it > seems to be related to the (Nokia?) n900 and it's latest updated branch > is from 9 weeks ago. > > Or is there more approvals I have to get to get the patch merged? Somebody has to decide that your patch is worth merging and take it. For ACPI-related patches that usually is me, but I haven't looked at it yet. I'll do that next week and let you know if all goes well. Thanks, Rafael