Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264471AbTEPPyT (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2003 11:54:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264474AbTEPPyT (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2003 11:54:19 -0400 Received: from locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil ([134.207.10.66]:23965 "EHLO locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264471AbTEPPyS (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2003 11:54:18 -0400 Message-Id: <200305161605.h4GG5fGi018381@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> To: "David S. Miller" cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM] add reference counting to atm_dev In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 15 May 2003 17:14:57 PDT." <20030515.171457.02279102.davem@redhat.com> X-url: http://www.nrl.navy.mil/CCS/people/chas/index.html X-mailer: nmh 1.0 Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 12:05:41 -0400 From: chas williams Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 874 Lines: 20 In message <20030515.171457.02279102.davem@redhat.com>,"David S. Miller" writes : >There is no correlation between whether you use netdevice or not >and whether network configuration changes should be synchronized >using the RTNL semaphore :-) true. however, i think i would like to do both at once. but it seems like just replacing atm_dev_lock with rtnl would probably be enough for right now. >Ok, I'll apply this. But long term we really need to clean out >the cobwebs here, use RTNL, do solid module refcounting etc. are you referring to the other bits of linux-atm like br2684, lane, mpoa, pppoatm or something else? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/