Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264481AbTEPQMh (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2003 12:12:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264482AbTEPQMh (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2003 12:12:37 -0400 Received: from twilight.ucw.cz ([81.30.235.3]:6321 "EHLO twilight.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264481AbTEPQMg (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2003 12:12:36 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 18:25:21 +0200 From: Vojtech Pavlik To: David van Hoose Cc: Vojtech Pavlik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] Support for SiS 961/961B/962/963/630S/630ET/633/733 IDE Message-ID: <20030516182521.A21496@ucw.cz> References: <20030516143021.A17346@ucw.cz> <3EC50CD9.6020508@cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3EC50CD9.6020508@cox.net>; from davidvh@cox.net on Fri, May 16, 2003 at 12:07:53PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1564 Lines: 38 On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 12:07:53PM -0400, David van Hoose wrote: > > The goal of this patch is to add support for the new generation of > > MuTIOL southbridges by SiS, namely the 961/961B, 962 and 963. These > > integrate the IDE controller, unlike all other SiS chipsets where the > > controller is bound to the northbridge. > > > > I had to do quite some research on what SiS IDE controllers exist that > > don't use the 96* southbridges, and thus found out that the 633 and 733 > > controllers were missing. So those were added too. > > > > This patch hovewer integrates a patch from Lionel which adds 630S/ET > > UDMA100 support. > > > > And while doing the changes I did also some cleanups, mainly removing a > > bunch of debug code that doesn't seem very useful when lspci does the > > same job. And removing the config_drive_xfer_rate in favor of functions > > from ide-timing.h. > > > > Tested on SiS963, works great. > > > > Patches for current 2.4 and 2.5 attached. > > I never thought about it, but my SiS963 is not recognized in lspci. The > below is a link which has a diagram of the SiS648/SiS963 combo that is > on my motherboard. Would it enhance performance any or would this > correction just be cosmetic? There will most likely be no change for you. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs, SuSE CR - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/