Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 21:46:28 +0200
From: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
To: esp@pyroshells.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAT32 problems with kernel 2.4.19
Message-ID: <20030516194628.GS3478@louise.pinerecords.com>
References: <23493.65.122.196.250.1053063209.squirrel@mail.webhaste.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <23493.65.122.196.250.1053063209.squirrel@mail.webhaste.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 857
Lines: 22

> [esp@pyroshells.com]
> 
> When I'm writing to FAT32 partition, there seems to be a 300% incurred
> size penalty over the equivalent files on ext2 (when unpacking a
> source distribution like boost, gcc, etc)

I don't understand what you're trying to say.  Can you elaborate?

> however it would be really, really nice if NTFS was supported (ie: if
> linux could write files on NTFS..) I have a sneaky suspicion that
> FAT32 isn't the greatest and only used on these drives because it is
> the lowest common denominator.

http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/info/ntfs.html

-- 
Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/