Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752087AbcL1Wcg (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2016 17:32:36 -0500 Received: from mail-qt0-f195.google.com ([209.85.216.195]:36175 "EHLO mail-qt0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751890AbcL1Wcf (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2016 17:32:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20161227211329.GA8195@amd> <87r34sjw29.fsf@intel.com> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 23:32:33 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: MXj_vITNA1oH6gQxhP0dUr3S7QU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?) To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com Cc: Jani Nikula , Pavel Machek , Thomas Gleixner , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Daniel Vetter , Chris Wilson , intel-gfx , LKML , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , Mika Kuoppala , Linux PM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3777 Lines: 101 On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>>> [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ] >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I have built Linux v4.10-rc1 today on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 system >>>>> and I see some call-traces. >>>>> It is reproducible on suspend and resume. >>>>> >>>>> I cannot say which area touches the problem or if these are several >>>>> independent problems. >>>>> >>>>> For a full dmesg-log see attachments (my linux-config is attached, too). >>>>> >>>>> Here some hunks... >>>>> >>>>> [ 29.003601] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at >>>>> drivers/base/power/runtime.c:1032 >>>>> [ 29.003608] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1469, name: Xorg >>>>> [ 29.003610] 1 lock held by Xorg/1469: >>>>> [ 29.003611] #0: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: >>>>> [] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x43/0x140 [i915] >>>>> [ 29.003653] CPU: 0 PID: 1469 Comm: Xorg Not tainted >>>>> 4.10.0-rc1-1-iniza-small #1 >>>>> [ 29.003655] Hardware name: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. >>>>> 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH/530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH, BIOS 13XK 03/28/2013 >>>>> [ 29.003656] Call Trace: >>>> >>>> Just a note, at least 2 machines here refuse to resume with >>>> v4.10-rc1. One has intel graphics, one has AMD. It may or may not have >>>> common cause... >>>> >>> >>> [ Correct linux-pm ML and add Mika & Jani ] >>> >>> Thanks for the feedback. >>> >>> There are some cpu/hotplug fixes post-v4.10-rc1. >>> Give that a try. >>> >>> Yesterday, after answers from drm-intel folks I have seen that a >>> cpu/hotplug commit [1] was reverted in >>> drm-intel.git#drm-intel-nightly. >>> I haven't tried that. >>> >>> It's good when Thomas knows of this and gets in contact with drm-intel folks. >>> >>> Regards, >>> - Sedat - >>> >>> [1] https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel/commit/?h=drm-intel-nightly&id=e558f178f5390185b7324ff4b816b52c6ae3a928 >>> [2] https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-intel-nightly >>> >>> P.S.: Revert "cpu/hotplug: Prevent overwriting of callbacks" >>> >>> This reverts commit dc280d93623927570da279e99393879dbbab39e7 >>> Author: Thomas Gleixner >>> Date: Wed Dec 21 20:19:49 2016 +0100 >>> cpu/hotplug: Prevent overwriting of callbacks >>> >>> It started hanging all machines in CI s3 test: >>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html >>> >>> Bisected-by: Mika Kuoppala >>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula >> >> Thomas - >> >> Indeed, basically all of the boxes in the intel-gfx CI hang at the >> suspend/resume test with dc280d936239 ("cpu/hotplug: Prevent overwriting >> of callbacks"), and after the revert in the tree that feeds to the CI, >> we're back on track. >> >> I found [1], was hoping to get feedback from Mika whether that helps >> before reporting. Chris also suggested [2] as a quick fix but I don't >> know if anyone tried that. >> > > Hi Jani, > > I know you were not CCed in the original thread, please see [5]. > > The patchset from Thomas you mention [1] does fix one of the problems > I have seen, please see [6]. > With these post-v4.10-rc1 patches applied a clean revert of Revert > "cpu/hotplug: Prevent overwriting of callbacks" is not possible. > > Can you give a clear statement if the quick-fix from Chris is in > combination with the above revert or not? > Against v4.10-rc1? > Tested together with the patchset of Thomas? Please test the Linus' tree from today, it should work. Thanks, Rafael