Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752172AbcL2Anq (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 28 Dec 2016 19:43:46 -0500
Received: from mail-ua0-f195.google.com ([209.85.217.195]:33994 "EHLO
        mail-ua0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751956AbcL2Anp (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 28 Dec 2016 19:43:45 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0hzUzPQGZxeU3W-jEAx6338qbNoJ7MAtwv_UtnSkXP=5w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+icZUVdjS8Wjjw5WxLZmv6JHV3ybFGnG8fi6TuafXDgGSV4SQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161227211329.GA8195@amd> <CA+icZUVb+zDRWV8SNVWx-U6w+i794OQ=ua4a+fTL2y5KihFAGA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87r34sjw29.fsf@intel.com> <CA+icZUWtOMcr0cE_S8Zbqsce1ETX2i_3hboj+suVoZSgXprZTA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJZ5v0hzUzPQGZxeU3W-jEAx6338qbNoJ7MAtwv_UtnSkXP=5w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 01:43:43 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+icZUXzuC+SxjQS=ZUYvx8f6kVjbrqUfKEa0uHKXC6a3b2=ug@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
        intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
        Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 4018
Lines: 104

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>>> [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have built Linux v4.10-rc1 today on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 system
>>>>>> and I see some call-traces.
>>>>>> It is reproducible on suspend and resume.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I cannot say which area touches the problem or if these are several
>>>>>> independent problems.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For a full dmesg-log see attachments (my linux-config is attached, too).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here some hunks...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [   29.003601] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
>>>>>> drivers/base/power/runtime.c:1032
>>>>>> [   29.003608] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1469, name: Xorg
>>>>>> [   29.003610] 1 lock held by Xorg/1469:
>>>>>> [   29.003611]  #0:  (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at:
>>>>>> [<ffffffffa0623c13>] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x43/0x140 [i915]
>>>>>> [   29.003653] CPU: 0 PID: 1469 Comm: Xorg Not tainted
>>>>>> 4.10.0-rc1-1-iniza-small #1
>>>>>> [   29.003655] Hardware name: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
>>>>>> 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH/530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH, BIOS 13XK 03/28/2013
>>>>>> [   29.003656] Call Trace:
>>>>>
>>>>> Just a note, at least 2 machines here refuse to resume with
>>>>> v4.10-rc1. One has intel graphics, one has AMD. It may or may not have
>>>>> common cause...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [ Correct linux-pm ML and add Mika & Jani ]
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the feedback.
>>>>
>>>> There are some cpu/hotplug fixes post-v4.10-rc1.
>>>> Give that a try.
>>>>
>>>> Yesterday, after answers from drm-intel folks I have seen that a
>>>> cpu/hotplug commit [1] was reverted in
>>>> drm-intel.git#drm-intel-nightly.
>>>> I haven't tried that.
>>>>
>>>> It's good when Thomas knows of this and gets in contact with drm-intel folks.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> - Sedat -
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel/commit/?h=drm-intel-nightly&id=e558f178f5390185b7324ff4b816b52c6ae3a928
>>>> [2] https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-intel-nightly
>>>>
>>>> P.S.: Revert "cpu/hotplug: Prevent overwriting of callbacks"
>>>>
>>>> This reverts commit dc280d93623927570da279e99393879dbbab39e7
>>>> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>>>> Date: Wed Dec 21 20:19:49 2016 +0100
>>>> cpu/hotplug: Prevent overwriting of callbacks
>>>>
>>>> It started hanging all machines in CI s3 test:
>>>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html
>>>>
>>>> Bisected-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Thomas -
>>>
>>> Indeed, basically all of the boxes in the intel-gfx CI hang at the
>>> suspend/resume test with dc280d936239 ("cpu/hotplug: Prevent overwriting
>>> of callbacks"), and after the revert in the tree that feeds to the CI,
>>> we're back on track.
>>>
>>> I found [1], was hoping to get feedback from Mika whether that helps
>>> before reporting. Chris also suggested [2] as a quick fix but I don't
>>> know if anyone tried that.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Jani,
>>
>> I know you were not CCed in the original thread, please see [5].
>>
>> The patchset from Thomas you mention [1] does fix one of the problems
>> I have seen, please see [6].
>> With these post-v4.10-rc1 patches applied a clean revert of Revert
>> "cpu/hotplug: Prevent overwriting of callbacks" is not possible.
>>
>> Can you give a clear statement if the quick-fix from Chris is in
>> combination with the above revert or not?
>> Against v4.10-rc1?
>> Tested together with the patchset of Thomas?
>
> Please test the Linus' tree from today, it should work.
>

Latest Linus tree (v4.10-rc1-17-g2d706e790f05) does not fix it.

- Sedat -