Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752482AbcL2Hkq (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 29 Dec 2016 02:40:46 -0500
Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:42300 "EHLO
        smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752041AbcL2Hko (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 29 Dec 2016 02:40:44 -0500
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 smtp.codeaurora.org 499DC604C8
Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none header.from=codeaurora.org
Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161228231659.GD17126@codeaurora.org>
References: <1482253431-23160-1-git-send-email-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
 <1482253431-23160-5-git-send-email-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> <20161228231659.GD17126@codeaurora.org>
From: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 13:09:53 +0530
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAFp+6iF0FQjt3bt1d_HjYmpMb8cTkg+BudoNR7yzThd+EgZfQg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAFp+6iF0FQjt3bt1d_HjYmpMb8cTkg+BudoNR7yzThd+EgZfQg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] phy: qcom-qmp: new qmp phy driver for qcom-chipsets
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "robh+dt" <robh+dt@kernel.org>, kishon <kishon@ti.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 4411
Lines: 131

Hi Stephen,


On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 12/20, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> Qualcomm SOCs have QMP phy controller that provides support
>> to a number of controller, viz. PCIe, UFS, and USB.
>> Add a new driver, based on generic phy framework, for this
>> phy controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
>> Tested-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>
>> +
>> +static struct phy *qcom_qmp_phy_xlate(struct device *dev,
>> +                                     struct of_phandle_args *args)
>> +{
>> +     struct qcom_qmp_phy *qphy = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +     int i;
>> +
>> +     if (WARN_ON(args->args[0] >= qphy->cfg->nlanes))
>> +             return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> +
>> +     for (i = 0; i < qphy->cfg->nlanes; i++)
>> +             /* phys[i]->index */
>> +             if (i == args->args[0])
>> +                     return qphy->phys[i]->phy;
>
> What's the loop for? If args->arg[0] < qphy->cfg->nlanes then we
> should be able to directly index the qphy->phys array with that
> number and return it.

Right, will do that.

>
>> +
>> +     return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> +}
>> +
> [...]
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * The <s>_pipe_clksrc generated by PHY goes to the GCC that gate
>> + * controls it. The <s>_pipe_clk coming out of the GCC is requested
>> + * by the PHY driver for its operations.
>> + * We register the <s>_pipe_clksrc here. The gcc driver takes care
>> + * of assigning this <s>_pipe_clksrc as parent to <s>_pipe_clk.
>> + * Below picture shows this relationship.
>> + *
>> + *      +--------------+
>> + *      |  PHY block   |<<---------------------------------------+
>> + *      |              |                                         |
>> + *      |   +-------+  |                   +-----+               |
>> + *   I/P---^-->|  PLL  |--^--->pipe_clksrc--->| GCC |--->pipe_clk---+
>> + *   clk   |   +-------+  |                +-----+
>> + *      +--------------+
>
> There are mixed tabs and spaces in this diagram causing
> confusion in my editor. Please make it only spaces so the picture
> comes out correctly.

Sure, will do that.

>
>> + *
>> + */
>> +static int phy_pipe_clk_register(struct qcom_qmp_phy *qphy, int id)
>> +{
>> +     char clk_name[MAX_PROP_NAME];
>
> I'm not sure MAX_PROP_NAME is the same as some max clk name but
> ok. We should be able to calculate that the maximum is length of
> usb3_phy_pipe_clk_src for now though?

Yea, i thought of using the same macro, considering that it provides
32 characters :-)
Will rather use the length of usb3_phy_pipe_clk_src for now. May be
#define MAX_CLK_NAME   24

>
>> +     struct clk *clk;
>> +
>> +     memset(&clk_name, 0, sizeof(clk_name));
>> +     switch (qphy->cfg->type) {
>> +     case PHY_TYPE_USB3:
>> +             snprintf(clk_name, MAX_PROP_NAME, "usb3_phy_pipe_clk_src");
>> +             break;
>> +     case PHY_TYPE_PCIE:
>> +             snprintf(clk_name, MAX_PROP_NAME, "pcie_%d_pipe_clk_src", id);
>> +             break;
>> +     default:
>> +             return -EINVAL;
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     /* controllers using QMP phys use 125MHz pipe clock interface */
>> +     clk = clk_register_fixed_rate(qphy->dev, clk_name, NULL, 0, 125000000);
>
> I was hoping you would be able to calculate the actual output
> rate by reading hardware. This is ok too though.

Yea, I too was looking to understand the phy registers needed to
calculate and re-calibrate the pipe clock rate, but couldn't find much
from the IP programming guide. So, I had to fall back to registering
a fixed-rate clock, since we are sure that the pipe clock rate is fixed at
125 MHz for the controllers using pipe interface.
Once we find out the required information, we can as well register clk_ops
for this clock.

> Just please use
> clk_hw_register_fixed_rate() instead. And you'll probably need
> some sort of devm() usage here to handle probe failure, so I
> would probably roll my own and allocate a fixed_rate clk
> structure and set the rate/name directly and then call
> devm_clk_hw_register().

Sure, will do that.

>
>> +
>> +     return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(clk);
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project


Thanks
Vivek
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project