Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261275AbTEQHSX (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 May 2003 03:18:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261292AbTEQHSX (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 May 2003 03:18:23 -0400 Received: from gw.enyo.de ([212.9.189.178]:23558 "EHLO mail.enyo.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261275AbTEQHSW (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 May 2003 03:18:22 -0400 To: "David S. Miller" Cc: Simon Kirby , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Route cache performance under stress References: <8765pshpd4.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <20030516222436.GA6620@netnation.com> <1053138910.7308.3.camel@rth.ninka.net> From: Florian Weimer Mail-Followup-To: "David S. Miller" , Simon Kirby , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 09:31:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1053138910.7308.3.camel@rth.ninka.net> (David S. Miller's message of "16 May 2003 19:35:10 -0700") Message-ID: <87d6iit4g7.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 770 Lines: 17 "David S. Miller" writes: > On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 15:24, Simon Kirby wrote: >> I have been seeing this problem for over a year, and have had the same >> problems you have with DoS attacks saturating the CPUs on our routers. > > Have a look at current kernels and see if they solve your problem. > They undoubtedly should, and I consider this issue resolved. The hash collision problem appears to be resolved, but not the more general performance issues. Or are there any kernels without a routing cache? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/