Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753668AbcL3KuY (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Dec 2016 05:50:24 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:40174 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752342AbcL3KuW (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Dec 2016 05:50:22 -0500 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 smtp.codeaurora.org 1572F61154 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=akdwived@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] remoteproc: qcom: Add and initialize proxy and active clocks. To: Bjorn Andersson References: <1481804490-8583-1-git-send-email-akdwived@codeaurora.org> <1481804490-8583-3-git-send-email-akdwived@codeaurora.org> <20161222214207.GA10519@minitux> Cc: sboyd@codeaurora.org, agross@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org From: "Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani)" Message-ID: <89757411-df44-95c0-37a6-fb3395c6144c@codeaurora.org> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 16:20:16 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161222214207.GA10519@minitux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 5299 Lines: 181 On 12/23/2016 3:12 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Thu 15 Dec 04:21 PST 2016, Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi wrote: > >> Certain regulators and clocks need voting by rproc on behalf of hexagon >> only during restart operation but certain clocks and voltage need to be >> voted till hexagon is up, these regulators and clocks are identified as >> proxy and active resource respectively, whose handle is being obtained >> by supplying proxy and active clock name string. >> >> Signed-off-by: Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi >> --- >> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- >> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c >> index d875448..8c8b239 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c >> @@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ >> >> struct rproc_hexagon_res { >> const char *hexagon_mba_image; >> + char **proxy_clk_string; >> + char **active_clk_string; > Use "name" instead of "string" in these variable names - i.e. > proxy_clk_names and active_clk_names. OK. > >> }; >> >> struct q6v5 { >> @@ -114,6 +116,11 @@ struct q6v5 { >> struct qcom_smem_state *state; >> unsigned stop_bit; >> >> + struct clk *active_clks[8]; >> + struct clk *proxy_clks[4]; >> + int active_clk_count; >> + int proxy_clk_count; >> + >> struct regulator_bulk_data supply[4]; >> >> struct clk *ahb_clk; >> @@ -706,27 +713,33 @@ static int q6v5_init_mem(struct q6v5 *qproc, struct platform_device *pdev) >> return 0; >> } >> >> -static int q6v5_init_clocks(struct q6v5 *qproc) >> +static int q6v5_init_clocks(struct device *dev, struct clk **clks, >> + char **clk_str) > clk_names OK. >> { >> - qproc->ahb_clk = devm_clk_get(qproc->dev, "iface"); >> - if (IS_ERR(qproc->ahb_clk)) { >> - dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to get iface clock\n"); >> - return PTR_ERR(qproc->ahb_clk); >> - } >> + int count = 0; >> + int i; >> >> - qproc->axi_clk = devm_clk_get(qproc->dev, "bus"); >> - if (IS_ERR(qproc->axi_clk)) { >> - dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to get bus clock\n"); >> - return PTR_ERR(qproc->axi_clk); >> - } >> + if (!clk_str) >> + return 0; >> + >> + while (clk_str[count]) >> + count++; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { > You can squash these two loops into one, e.g. replace them with: > > for (i = 0; clk_str[i]; i++) {} > > and then return "i". OK. >> + clks[i] = devm_clk_get(dev, clk_str[i]); >> + if (IS_ERR(clks[i])) { >> + >> + int rc = PTR_ERR(clks[i]); >> + >> + if (rc != -EPROBE_DEFER) >> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get %s clock\n", >> + clk_str[i]); >> + return rc; >> + } >> >> - qproc->rom_clk = devm_clk_get(qproc->dev, "mem"); >> - if (IS_ERR(qproc->rom_clk)) { >> - dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to get mem clock\n"); >> - return PTR_ERR(qproc->rom_clk); >> } >> >> - return 0; >> + return count; >> } >> >> static int q6v5_init_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc) >> @@ -843,9 +856,21 @@ static int q6v5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> if (ret) >> goto free_rproc; >> >> - ret = q6v5_init_clocks(qproc); >> - if (ret) >> + ret = q6v5_init_clocks(&pdev->dev, qproc->proxy_clks, >> + desc->proxy_clk_string); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to setup proxy clocks.\n"); > Please replace "setup" with "acquire" or "get". OK. > >> + goto free_rproc; >> + } >> + qproc->proxy_clk_count = ret; >> + >> + ret = q6v5_init_clocks(&pdev->dev, qproc->active_clks, >> + desc->active_clk_string); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to setup active clocks.\n"); > Dito. OK. >> goto free_rproc; >> + } >> + qproc->active_clk_count = ret; >> >> ret = q6v5_regulator_init(qproc); >> if (ret) >> @@ -901,10 +926,14 @@ static int q6v5_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> >> static const struct rproc_hexagon_res msm8916_mss = { >> .hexagon_mba_image = "mba.mbn", >> + .proxy_clk_string = (char*[]){"xo", NULL}, >> + .active_clk_string = (char*[]){"iface", "bus", "mem", NULL}, > Line wrap these list of clock names, like: > > .active_clk_string = (char*[]){ > "iface", > "bus", > "mem", > NULL > }, > > Makes it consistent with the regulator > patch and it's easier for me to read. OK. > >> }; >> >> static const struct rproc_hexagon_res msm8974_mss = { >> .hexagon_mba_image = "mba.b00", >> + .proxy_clk_string = (char*[]){"xo", NULL}, >> + .active_clk_string = (char*[]){"iface", "bus", "mem", NULL}, > Dito OK >> }; > If I apply this patch without patch 5 (Modify clock enable and disable > interface) we will successfully probe with the new clocks, but we will > not be able to boot because ahb_clk, axi_clk and rom_clk are NULL. > > When you're sending patches you should make sure that the code works > (before and) after each patch that you introduce. > > So please squash patch 5 into this patch. OK, will squash patches into functional units and send them. > > > Other than that and these small style comments I think this patch looks > good! Thanks. > > Regards, > Bjorn -- Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.