Subject: Re: 2.5.69-mm5: reverting i8259-shutdown.patch
From: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
To: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linuxpower.ca>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0305171107090.2356-100000@montezuma.mastecende.com>
References: <20030514193300.58645206.akpm@digeo.com>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305141935440.9816-100000@cherise>
	 <20030514231414.42398dda.akpm@digeo.com>
	 <1053000426.605.4.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.50.0305171107090.2356-100000@montezuma.mastecende.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1053200826.586.3.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: 17 May 2003 21:47:07 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1005
Lines: 25

On Sat, 2003-05-17 at 21:25, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2003, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> 
> > > In this case we need to understand why the lockup is happening - what
> > > code is requiring 8259 services after the thing has been turned off?
> > > Could be that the bug lies there.
> > > 
> > > Felipe, please send your .config.   (again - in fact you may as well do
> > > cp .config ~/.signature)
> > 
> > Config attached...
> > Don't understand what do you mean with "cp .config ~/.signature" :-?
> > 
> Unable to reproduce, appears to be machine specific, 1 laptop and 2 test 
> systems both managed to power off with APM or ACPI. Also tried with 
> Felipe's config

The machine is a NEC (Packard Bell) Chrom@. Could an lspci be of
interest?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/