Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261852AbTEQVlv (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 May 2003 17:41:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261855AbTEQVlv (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 May 2003 17:41:51 -0400 Received: from ip68-4-255-84.oc.oc.cox.net ([68.4.255.84]:48017 "EHLO ip68-101-124-193.oc.oc.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261852AbTEQVlt (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 May 2003 17:41:49 -0400 Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 14:54:42 -0700 From: "Barry K. Nathan" To: dak@gnu.org Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Scheduling problem with 2.4? Message-ID: <20030517215442.GB2411@ip68-101-124-193.oc.oc.cox.net> References: <20030517174100.GT1429@dualathlon.random> <20030517203045.GZ1429@dualathlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 920 Lines: 21 On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 10:44:16PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > I am talking about the kernel coming with RedHat 9, uname -a gives > Linux lola.goethe.zz 2.4.20-8 #1 Thu Mar 13 17:54:28 EST 2003 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux > > Unfortunately, this kernel is here to stay for quite a while, and I > would want to find a way to let Emacs cooperate with it better without > telling people to recompile the kernel or wait a year. They should be upgrading to the kernel here, at least, for security reasons: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-172.html I have no idea what effect, if any, it would have on your performance problems though. -Barry K. Nathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/