Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752394AbdCAL12 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2017 06:27:28 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:39136 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750709AbdCAL1S (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2017 06:27:18 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:26:36 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Dou Liyang cc: mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, hpa@zytor.com, rafael@kernel.org, cl@linux.com, tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, len.brown@intel.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, xiaolong.ye@intel.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] acpi: Move the verification of duplicate proc_id from booting time to hot-plug time In-Reply-To: <1487580471-17665-5-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <1487580471-17665-1-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <1487580471-17665-5-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1284 Lines: 43 On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Dou Liyang wrote: Please make your subject line short and a precise summary phrase, not an overlong sentence. > After we revert the the mapping of "cpuid <-> nodeid" fixed at the > booting time. and do it at the hot-plug time. we should also do the > verification of duplicate proc_id at the time. The revert is completely irrelevant to this change, really. The reference is just confusing. > The patch rename the verfication function and move it to > drivers/acpi::acpi_processor_get_info. See previous mails .... Let me give you another changelog example: Subject: acpi/processor: Check for duplicate processor ids at hotplug time The check for duplicate processor ids happens at boot time based on the ACPI table contents, but the final sanity checks for a processor happen at hotplug time. At hotplug time, where the physical information is available, which might differ from the ACPI table information, a check for duplicate processor ids is missing. Add it to the hotplug checks and rename the function so it better reflects its purpose. Hmm? > > -bool __init acpi_processor_validate_proc_id(int proc_id) > +bool duplicate_processor_id(int proc_id) Please keep the acpi_ prefix. acpi_duplicate_processor_id(). Thanks, tglx