Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261904AbTERB2x (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 May 2003 21:28:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261917AbTERB2x (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 May 2003 21:28:53 -0400 Received: from vladimir.pegasys.ws ([64.220.160.58]:47885 "HELO vladimir.pegasys.ws") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261904AbTERB2v (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 May 2003 21:28:51 -0400 Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 18:39:26 -0700 From: jw schultz To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What exactly does "supports Linux" mean? Message-ID: <20030518013926.GA16286@pegasys.ws> Mail-Followup-To: jw schultz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030514021210.GD30766@pegasys.ws> <20030517160509.GA283@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030517160509.GA283@elf.ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2065 Lines: 52 On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 06:05:09PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > Linux compatible: > > > > Source code driver is available as a patch. > > > > > > In other words, if a patch is available for the 1.0.0 kernel, they > > > can claim "Linux compatible" ??? That's meaningless...replace with > > > something like... > > Yep, I guess patch for 1.0.0 kernel would count as Linux compatible. I If the box has been on the shelf for 8 years it would. If the driver isn't in mainline i'm not very interested in what drivers are in the box. I want a URL where i can go and look to see the versions for download. > even believe that patch for FreeBSD would count as Linux > compatible. As long as you can get source of the driver, it is easy. There is a big difference between "some assembly required" and "some machining required". Driver source that has to be modified doesn't count. This isn't labelling for kernel hackers. Some people need it to just work, others are OK following a script to patch and rebuild or setup an insmod. What we are talking about is enough info that someone should feel comfortable buying the box with the expectation of support at the level they require. > Maybe better sticker would be > > "includes driver sources". > > [Long time ago I got double-speed cdrom, and on its driver disk, there > was C source of the driver. Porting it to linux was matter of two > days, IIRC. And it had korean comments ;-)]. Perhaps you'd be willing to help Aunt Tillie do this. Your definition of "includes driver sources" will appeal to such a small market segment it isn't worth the ink on the box. -- ________________________________________________________________ J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies email address: jw@pegasys.ws Remember Cernan and Schmitt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/