Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753435AbdCAVwM (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:52:12 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:35672 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753369AbdCAVvu (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:51:50 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 15:41:20 -0600 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Logan Gunthorpe Cc: Keith Busch , Myron Stowe , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Bjorn Helgaas , Geert Uytterhoeven , Jonathan Corbet , "David S. Miller" , Andrew Morton , Emil Velikov , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Guenter Roeck , Jarkko Sakkinen , Linus Walleij , Ryusuke Konishi , Stefan Berger , Wei Zhang , Kurt Schwemmer , Stephen Bates , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] New Microsemi PCI Switch Management Driver Message-ID: <20170301214120.GA30451@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> References: <1488091997-12843-1-git-send-email-logang@deltatee.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1488091997-12843-1-git-send-email-logang@deltatee.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1540 Lines: 33 On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 11:53:13PM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > Changes since v4: > > * Turns out pushing the pci release code into the device release > function didn't work as I would have liked. If you try to unbind the > device with an instance open, then you hit a kernel bug at > drivers/pci/msi.c:371. (This didn't occur in v3.) This is in free_msi_irqs(): 368 for_each_pci_msi_entry(entry, dev) 369 if (entry->irq) 370 for (i = 0; i < entry->nvec_used; i++) 371 BUG_ON(irq_has_action(entry->irq + i)); I don't think this is indicating a bug in the PCI core (although I do think a BUG_ON() here is an excessive response). I think it's an indication that the driver didn't disconnect its ISR. Without more details of the failure it's hard to tell if the BUG_ON is a symptom of a problem in the driver or what. An "alive" flag feels racy, and I can't tell if it's really the best way to deal with this, or if it's just avoiding the issue. There must be other drivers with the same cleanup issue -- do they handle it the same way? > To solve this, we've moved the pci release code back into the > unregister function and reintroduced an alive flag. This time, > however, the alive flag is protected by mrpc_mutex and we're very > careful about what happens to devices still in use (they should > all be released through the timeout path and an ENODEV error > returned to userspace; while new commands are blocked with the > same error).