Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753397AbdCAWFd convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:05:33 -0500
Received: from userp1050.oracle.com ([156.151.31.82]:42803 "EHLO
        userp1050.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751499AbdCAWF2 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:05:28 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux v3 2/9] x86/acpi: store ACPI ids from MADT for
 future usage
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
References: <1469536228-29932-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com>
 <1469536228-29932-3-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703012036150.3684@nanos>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        x86@kernel.org, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
        David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
        Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <8b530c25-48e1-dba7-42dd-74dfe496af04@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:04:03 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703012036150.3684@nanos>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-Source-IP: userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 289
Lines: 14

On 03/01/2017 02:54 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> Yes, I know it has been fixed later, but this crap should not have been
> merged in the first place.
>
> Yours grumpy
>
>       tglx


Yes, we dropped the ball on this, this shouldn't have gone in without
x86 maintainers' review.

-boris