Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262123AbTERQWz (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 May 2003 12:22:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262126AbTERQWz (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 May 2003 12:22:55 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:2273 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262123AbTERQWz (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 May 2003 12:22:55 -0400 Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 09:35:37 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: ptb@it.uc3m.es, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: recursive spinlocks. Shoot. Message-ID: <20030518163537.GZ8978@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , "Martin J. Bligh" , ptb@it.uc3m.es, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200305180921.h4I9LdD13274@oboe.it.uc3m.es> <19930000.1053275409@[10.10.2.4]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19930000.1053275409@[10.10.2.4]> Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 545 Lines: 16 At some point in the past, Peter Breuer's attribution was removed from: >> Here's a before-breakfast implementation of a recursive spinlock. That >> is, the same thread can "take" the spinlock repeatedly. On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 09:30:17AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > Why? netconsole. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/