Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752202AbdCBRp0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2017 12:45:26 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:33522 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752332AbdCBRpW (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2017 12:45:22 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 12:44:41 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Michael Ellerman Cc: David Daney , Jason Baron , Sachin Sant , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Chris Metcalf , Ralf Baechle , Russell King , Rabin Vincent , Paul Mackerras , Anton Blanchard , Ingo Molnar , Zhigang Lu Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: set __jump_table alignment to 8 Message-ID: <20170302124441.0e2634e0@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <8737ewexkp.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> References: <20170301220453.4756-1-david.daney@cavium.com> <87varsj6qc.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <8737ewexkp.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1062 Lines: 28 On Thu, 02 Mar 2017 22:18:30 +1100 Michael Ellerman wrote: > Michael Ellerman writes: > > David Daney writes: > >> Strict alignment became necessary with commit 3821fd35b58d > >> ("jump_label: Reduce the size of struct static_key"), currently in > >> linux-next, which uses the two least significant bits of pointers to > >> __jump_table elements. > > > > It would obviously be nice if this could go in before the commit that > > exposes the breakage, but I guess that's problematic because Steve > > doesn't want to rebase the tracing tree. > > > > Steve I think you've already sent your pull request for this cycle? So I > > guess if this can go in your first batch of fixes? > > Ugh. Was looking at the wrong tree - Linus has already merged the commit > in question, so the above is all moot. No problem. I've got some other "fixes" to push to Linus. That's what the -rc releases are for. To fix up breakage from the merge window ;-) I'll pull this into my tree. Thanks! -- Steve