Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751589AbdCCDoi (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2017 22:44:38 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:46975 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751356AbdCCDoh (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2017 22:44:37 -0500 From: Michael Ellerman To: Steven Rostedt Cc: David Daney , Jason Baron , Sachin Sant , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Chris Metcalf , Ralf Baechle , Russell King , Rabin Vincent , Paul Mackerras , Anton Blanchard , Ingo Molnar , Zhigang Lu Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: set __jump_table alignment to 8 In-Reply-To: <20170302124441.0e2634e0@gandalf.local.home> References: <20170301220453.4756-1-david.daney@cavium.com> <87varsj6qc.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <8737ewexkp.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <20170302124441.0e2634e0@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21 (https://notmuchmail.org) Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 14:34:58 +1100 Message-ID: <87innrhw2l.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1147 Lines: 30 Steven Rostedt writes: > On Thu, 02 Mar 2017 22:18:30 +1100 > Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Michael Ellerman writes: >> > David Daney writes: >> >> Strict alignment became necessary with commit 3821fd35b58d >> >> ("jump_label: Reduce the size of struct static_key"), currently in >> >> linux-next, which uses the two least significant bits of pointers to >> >> __jump_table elements. >> > >> > It would obviously be nice if this could go in before the commit that >> > exposes the breakage, but I guess that's problematic because Steve >> > doesn't want to rebase the tracing tree. >> > >> > Steve I think you've already sent your pull request for this cycle? So I >> > guess if this can go in your first batch of fixes? >> >> Ugh. Was looking at the wrong tree - Linus has already merged the commit >> in question, so the above is all moot. > > No problem. I've got some other "fixes" to push to Linus. That's what > the -rc releases are for. To fix up breakage from the merge window ;-) Yep, no drama. > I'll pull this into my tree. Thanks. cheers