Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751824AbdCCMpw (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 3 Mar 2017 07:45:52 -0500
Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([62.4.15.54]:34754 "EHLO
        mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751369AbdCCMpr (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 3 Mar 2017 07:45:47 -0500
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 13:34:19 +0100
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Cc: Alban <albeu@free.fr>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
        Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@ettus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mtd: Add support for reading MTD devices via the
 nvmem API
Message-ID: <20170303133419.2383dbce@bbrezillon>
In-Reply-To: <b2df74bb-dd86-bac1-ab8b-cbff6ca29b6f@linaro.org>
References: <1488484223-844-1-git-send-email-albeu@free.fr>
        <1488484223-844-3-git-send-email-albeu@free.fr>
        <b2df74bb-dd86-bac1-ab8b-cbff6ca29b6f@linaro.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1246
Lines: 33

On Fri, 3 Mar 2017 11:23:16 +0000
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> wrote:


> 
> > +	mutex_lock(&mtd_nvmem_list_lock);
> > +	list_for_each_entry(mtd_nvmem, &mtd_nvmem_list, list) {
> > +		if (mtd_nvmem->mtd == mtd) {
> > +			list_del(&mtd_nvmem->list);
> > +			found = true;
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +	mutex_unlock(&mtd_nvmem_list_lock);
> > +
> > +	if (found) {
> > +		if (nvmem_unregister(mtd_nvmem->nvmem))
> > +			dev_err(&mtd->dev,
> > +				"Failed to unregister NVMEM device\n");  
> 
> I will be nice to feedback error to top layer, as it does not make sense 
> to remove providers if there are active consumers using it.
> 
> del_mtd_device(), unregister_mtd_user() have return values, I see no 
> reason why notifiers  should not return errors.
> May be if we should fix the remove() call backs to handle and return errors.

It's more complicated than that. What should you do if one of the
->remove() notifier in the middle of the list is returning an error?
Some of them have already taken the remove notification into account.
Should we call ->add() back on those notifiers? Also, I'm not sure they
are all safe against double ->remove() calls, so if we might be in
trouble when the removal is retried.