Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752308AbdCCXzR (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2017 18:55:17 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52413 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752087AbdCCXzP (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2017 18:55:15 -0500 From: NeilBrown To: Jeff Layton , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2017 10:55:04 +1100 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 11/30] fs: new API for handling i_version In-Reply-To: <1482339827-7882-12-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> References: <1482339827-7882-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> <1482339827-7882-12-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> Message-ID: <8737etncfb.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1894 Lines: 56 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, Dec 21 2016, Jeff Layton wrote: > We already have inode_inc_iversion. Add inode_set_iversion, > inode_get_iversion, inode_cmp_iversion and inode_iversion_need_inc. This list of added interfaces is incomplete. And some of these interfaces could really use some justification up front. You later add a "force" parameter to inode_inc_version. Why not do that up front here? > + > +/** > + * inode_get_iversion - read i_version for later use > + * @inode: inode from which i_version should be read > + * > + * Read the inode i_version counter. This should be used by callers that wish > + * to store the returned i_version for later comparison. > + */ > +static inline u64 > +inode_get_iversion(const struct inode *inode) > +{ > + return inode_get_iversion_raw(inode); > +} I don't understand why this can use the _raw version rather than the _read version. Surely you need to know about any changes after this read. Thanks, NeilBrown --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEG8Yp69OQ2HB7X0l6Oeye3VZigbkFAli6AlgACgkQOeye3VZi gbmgpA/+Jvdv8FSZ8uY3DCx8phipNwrzX0yRr3pH2isCbNyBSDo8humzA+046YnM AQUakqeUzXzJKkXL5kiYjyoRyQ2JecSfHHETQeUrhlMAAnROdU/mvkeLBcg8mCf1 qTI+QxHLKmBzGbnS5vsGkX/1sOk+adlnz9bhKWB6q14zTeANs4oapsqZZgwNWeFl VJ29tbL+VCzXfJ3yedgK7en2WQw/5VOP6gkoqeTrhXldy1PvF8en77oOnEScXnIp Q0h90vZxQfbIx2WFNdNh2z2CELl/fq8WC6tpVGoDsXEe1oHTa9jmHc1hTXSZogk4 IbCCUt8D3gy7FLINO4eoe4GSz4w2rtibdyJ6+kKs2TCjwaYCUS9TCYm803WXAVoT IgNJhaNKez42Yszb5Q1m/FKnKviMWlP9iBVHi8tNBex4QtA+crnbZCUfeiJozkJj owMOc9ckIjndcgydGwCpvovjnFACrSmiomfyVdbMIyVYPyiKlL461rRMU1mSSqum jgcxIlJBSz+xL2T2KnkQp8dX1AG8STQDSr3rTUwlm3WUAHVoRsHteqO2I+1eTh3Q VEBCilylvv/s2pE93YxoC6DegVVjWvdmdIDRIKhInCH01Nd34YvOxrK22D3ifJnt qJRRFy5TfKFhuQhwzsTfaPLMO+L+G3uEN6GcL2XXUpGYXob0I7I= =UjhU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--