Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262498AbTESPBC (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 11:01:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262499AbTESPBC (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 11:01:02 -0400 Received: from almesberger.net ([63.105.73.239]:13321 "EHLO host.almesberger.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262498AbTESPBA (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 11:01:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 12:13:31 -0300 From: Werner Almesberger To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] sched-cleanup-2.5.69-A0 Message-ID: <20030519121331.C1475@almesberger.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from mingo@elte.hu on Mon, May 19, 2003 at 10:25:44AM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1063 Lines: 26 Ingo Molnar wrote: > the attached scheduler cleanup (against BK-curr) removes the unused > requeueing code. Compiles & boots. Ah, what a sweet way of getting rid of my nemesis :-) The requeuing code troubled me quite a bit with umlsim, which makes all kinds of calls from the idle task, including calls to try_to_wake_up, or functions that eventually call it. Naturally, whenever the requeuing was used, it tripped over current->array. (And even with a fake array, it would have had ill effects.) So the requeuing didn't do anything for processes other than the idle task ? - Werner -- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net / /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/