Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752474AbdCERtA (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Mar 2017 12:49:00 -0500 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:9301 "EHLO mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751573AbdCERs7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Mar 2017 12:48:59 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,249,1484002800"; d="scan'208";a="215633301" Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 18:48:46 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: SIMRAN SINGHAL cc: Julia Lawall , oleg.drokin@intel.com, andreas.dilger@intel.com, jsimmons@infradead.org, Greg KH , lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 5/5] staging: lustre: osc_page.c: Use list_for_each_entry_safe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1488733610-22289-1-git-send-email-singhalsimran0@gmail.com> <1488733610-22289-6-git-send-email-singhalsimran0@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4616 Lines: 122 On Sun, 5 Mar 2017, SIMRAN SINGHAL wrote: > On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Julia Lawall wrote: > > By the way, the above subject line is not correct. Normally one does not > > put .c/.h in the subject line. Indeed, there is not really any > > deterministic algorithm for choosing the subject line. You need to run > > git log --oneline filename to see what others have done. > > So this would be fine Subject:- > staging: lustre: osc_page: Use list_for_each_entry_safe Looking at the result of git log --oneline, I would say: staging: lustre: osc: For example that it what is used by 86df598, which also only changes the file modified by this patch. julia > > > > > julia > > > > On Sun, 5 Mar 2017, simran singhal wrote: > > > >> Doubly linked lists which are iterated using list_empty > >> and list_entry macros have been replaced with list_for_each_entry_safe > >> macro. > >> This makes the iteration simpler and more readable. > >> > >> This patch replaces the while loop containing list_empty and list_entry > >> with list_for_each_entry_safe. > >> > >> This was done with Coccinelle. > >> > >> @@ > >> expression E1; > >> identifier I1, I2; > >> type T; > >> iterator name list_for_each_entry_safe; > >> @@ > >> > >> T *I1; > >> + T *tmp; > >> ... > >> - while (list_empty(&E1) == 0) > >> + list_for_each_entry_safe (I1, tmp, &E1, I2) > >> { > >> ...when != T *I1; > >> - I1 = list_entry(E1.next, T, I2); > >> ... > >> } > >> > >> Signed-off-by: simran singhal > >> --- > >> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c | 11 ++++------- > >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c > >> index ed8a0dc..e8b974f 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c > >> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c > >> @@ -542,6 +542,7 @@ long osc_lru_shrink(const struct lu_env *env, struct client_obd *cli, > >> struct cl_object *clobj = NULL; > >> struct cl_page **pvec; > >> struct osc_page *opg; > >> + struct osc_page *tmp; > >> int maxscan = 0; > >> long count = 0; > >> int index = 0; > >> @@ -572,7 +573,7 @@ long osc_lru_shrink(const struct lu_env *env, struct client_obd *cli, > >> if (force) > >> cli->cl_lru_reclaim++; > >> maxscan = min(target << 1, atomic_long_read(&cli->cl_lru_in_list)); > >> - while (!list_empty(&cli->cl_lru_list)) { > >> + list_for_each_entry_safe(opg, tmp, &cli->cl_lru_list, ops_lru) { > >> struct cl_page *page; > >> bool will_free = false; > >> > >> @@ -582,8 +583,6 @@ long osc_lru_shrink(const struct lu_env *env, struct client_obd *cli, > >> if (--maxscan < 0) > >> break; > >> > >> - opg = list_entry(cli->cl_lru_list.next, struct osc_page, > >> - ops_lru); > >> page = opg->ops_cl.cpl_page; > >> if (lru_page_busy(cli, page)) { > >> list_move_tail(&opg->ops_lru, &cli->cl_lru_list); > >> @@ -1043,6 +1042,7 @@ unsigned long osc_cache_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *sk, > >> { > >> struct client_obd *stop_anchor = NULL; > >> struct client_obd *cli; > >> + struct client_obd *tmp; > >> struct lu_env *env; > >> long shrank = 0; > >> u16 refcheck; > >> @@ -1059,10 +1059,7 @@ unsigned long osc_cache_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *sk, > >> return SHRINK_STOP; > >> > >> spin_lock(&osc_shrink_lock); > >> - while (!list_empty(&osc_shrink_list)) { > >> - cli = list_entry(osc_shrink_list.next, struct client_obd, > >> - cl_shrink_list); > >> - > >> + list_for_each_entry_safe(cli, tmp, &osc_shrink_list, cl_shrink_list) { > >> if (!stop_anchor) > >> stop_anchor = cli; > >> else if (cli == stop_anchor) > >> -- > >> 2.7.4 > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group. > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > >> To post to this group, send email to outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com. > >> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/1488733610-22289-6-git-send-email-singhalsimran0%40gmail.com. > >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > >> >