Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262157AbTESQta (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 12:49:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262270AbTESQta (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 12:49:30 -0400 Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk ([193.162.159.95]:44040 "EHLO pasmtp.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262157AbTESQt3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 12:49:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 19:02:26 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Brian Gerst , Kai Germaschewski Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux-Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update fs Makefiles Message-ID: <20030519170226.GB983@mars.ravnborg.org> Mail-Followup-To: Brian Gerst , Kai Germaschewski , Linus Torvalds , Linux-Kernel References: <3EC82A7D.5090105@quark.didntduck.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EC82A7D.5090105@quark.didntduck.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 721 Lines: 20 On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 08:51:09PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote: > Convert foo-objs to newer-style foo-y. The paths looks correct. But do we really want to go that far, and deprecate the -objs syntax? > -adfs-objs := dir.o dir_f.o dir_fplus.o file.o inode.o map.o super.o > +adfs-y := dir.o dir_f.o dir_fplus.o file.o inode.o map.o super.o The patch contains a lot of changes like the above - and they are only relevant if we deprecate the -objs syntax. Opinions anyone? Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/