Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262390AbTESRZ6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 13:25:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262528AbTESRZ6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 13:25:58 -0400 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.102]:17845 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262390AbTESRZ5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 13:25:57 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 10:39:08 -0700 From: Greg KH To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: And yet another it87 patch. Message-ID: <20030519173908.GA25145@kroah.com> References: <20030518222150.GA24805@babylon.d2dc.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030518222150.GA24805@babylon.d2dc.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 664 Lines: 20 On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 06:21:50PM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: > Trivial, but important. > > Somehow in the patching the bk tree somehow got two memset's to clear > new_client in it87_detect, normally while this would be bad, it would > not be critical. > > However one of the two happens BEFORE the variable is set, and thus > things go badly. That's a wierd merge problem, sorry about that. Applied. greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/