Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754281AbdCFTD6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2017 14:03:58 -0500 Received: from b.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.144]:44723 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754222AbdCFTDr (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2017 14:03:47 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mtd: Add support for reading MTD devices via the nvmem API To: Alban References: <1488484223-844-1-git-send-email-albeu@free.fr> <1488484223-844-3-git-send-email-albeu@free.fr> <20170302221803.223ff23b@bbrezillon> <20170303133629.3aac2945@tock> <20170303143658.5d89a329@bbrezillon> <20170303145726.16cd67fd@tock> <20170303151107.36754d19@bbrezillon> <54c76650-b61f-8a4c-70c7-febe76e16d3b@nod.at> <20170306182147.65d59d33@avionic-0020> Cc: Boris Brezillon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Cyrille Pitchen , Marek Vasut , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , Maxime Ripard , Srinivas Kandagatla , Moritz Fischer From: Richard Weinberger Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:03:28 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170306182147.65d59d33@avionic-0020> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1028 Lines: 27 Am 06.03.2017 um 18:21 schrieb Alban: > On Fri, 3 Mar 2017 23:21:29 +0100 > Richard Weinberger wrote: > >> Am 03.03.2017 um 15:11 schrieb Boris Brezillon: >>>> And add a list of successfully added notifiers, along with their >>>> data pointer, to the MTD device. That's simple and would also remove >>>> the need for notifier to have a private list of their instances as I >>>> had to do here. >>> >>> And then you're abusing the notifier concept. As said earlier, a >>> notifier is not necessarily using the device, and thus, don't >>> necessarily need private data. >>> It's not only about what is the simplest solution for your use case, >>> but also what other users want/need. >> >> Yes, please don't use the mtd_notifier. >> I strongly vote to embed the nvmem pointer into struct mtd_info. > > Ok, I'll do that. However it mean it will have to stays in > drivers/mtd as it then become part of the MTD core. Brian, are you fine with this? I know, refcounting in MTD is tricky. :( Thanks, //richard