Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754424AbdCFTEU (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2017 14:04:20 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f67.google.com ([209.85.214.67]:34428 "EHLO mail-it0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754283AbdCFTD6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2017 14:03:58 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20170306135357.3124-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 11:03:56 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wunqzlbF2Tzkr5aG_gxNPJk8XZQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 00/33] 5-level paging To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Andrew Morton , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , Ingo Molnar , Arnd Bergmann , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andi Kleen , Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , linux-mm , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 759 Lines: 19 On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > We probably need to split it apart: > > - Apply the mm core only parts to a branch which can be pulled into > Andrews mm-tree > > - Base the x86 changes on top of it I'll happily take some of the preparatory patches for 4.11 too. Some of them just don't seem to have any downside. The cpuid stuff, and the basic scaffolding we could easily merge early. That includes the dummy 5level code, ie "5level-fixup.h" and even some of the mm side that doesn't actually change anything and just prepares for the real code. But having some base branch too just for avoiding conflicts with whatever mm stuff that Andrew keeps around sounds fine too. Linus