Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754777AbdCGIbT (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Mar 2017 03:31:19 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:36725 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753525AbdCGIbK (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Mar 2017 03:31:10 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:52:00 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "David F." Cc: linux-kernel , "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: When will Linux support M2 on RAID ? Message-ID: <20170307045200.GA1708@infradead.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 513 Lines: 10 On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 06:09:42PM -0800, David F. wrote: > More and more systems are coming with M2 on RAID and Linux doesn't > work unless you change the system out of RAID mode. This is becoming > more and more of a problem. What is the status of Linux support for > the new systems? Your message doesn't make sense at all. MD works on absolutely any Linux block device, and I've used it on plenty M.2 form factor devices - not that the form factor has anything to do with how Linux would treat a device.