Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262284AbTESXu3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 19:50:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262289AbTESXu3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 19:50:29 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:52408 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262284AbTESXu2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 19:50:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 01:03:25 +0100 From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: recursive spinlocks. Shoot. Message-ID: <20030520000325.GK10374@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <200305191337.h4JDbf311387@oboe.it.uc3m.es> <200305192354.h4JNsfQ09659@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200305192354.h4JNsfQ09659@devserv.devel.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 572 Lines: 13 On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 07:54:41PM -0400, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > BTW, I do not see Linus and his leutenants rebuking the onslaught > of recursive ingenuity in this thread. Ignoring the hogwash, > or waiting and watching? Watching people flog the darkened spot where a dead horse used to be 5 years ago. Amusing sight, that... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/