Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932713AbdCGQia (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Mar 2017 11:38:30 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:47944 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754933AbdCGQiQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Mar 2017 11:38:16 -0500 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org E4AAB605A2 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=tbaicar@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 00/10] Add UEFI 2.6 and ACPI 6.1 updates for RAS on ARM64 To: James Morse References: <1488833103-21082-1-git-send-email-tbaicar@codeaurora.org> <58BE9B6B.3020000@arm.com> Cc: christoffer.dall@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, robert.moore@intel.com, lv.zheng@intel.com, nkaje@codeaurora.org, zjzhang@codeaurora.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, eun.taik.lee@samsung.com, sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com, labbott@redhat.com, shijie.huang@arm.com, rruigrok@codeaurora.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, tn@semihalf.com, fu.wei@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, bristot@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org, Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com, punit.agrawal@arm.com, astone@redhat.com, harba@codeaurora.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, john.garry@huawei.com, shiju.jose@huawei.com, joe@perches.com From: "Baicar, Tyler" Message-ID: <0908a4cc-bb6b-341b-0bde-ccb820d17385@codeaurora.org> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:37:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <58BE9B6B.3020000@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1752 Lines: 33 On 3/7/2017 4:37 AM, James Morse wrote: > Hi Tyler, > > On 06/03/17 20:44, Tyler Baicar wrote: >> When a memory error, CPU error, PCIe error, or other type of hardware error >> that's covered by RAS occurs, firmware should populate the shared GHES memory >> location with the proper GHES structures to notify the OS of the error. >> For example, platforms that implement firmware first handling may implement >> separate GHES sources for corrected errors and uncorrected errors. If the >> error is an uncorrectable error, then the firmware will notify the OS >> immediately since the error needs to be handled ASAP. The OS will then be able >> to take the appropriate action needed such as offlining a page. If the error >> is a corrected error, then the firmware will not interrupt the OS immediately. >> Instead, the OS will see and report the error the next time it's GHES timer >> expires. The kernel will first parse the GHES structures and report the errors >> through the kernel logs and then notify the user space through RAS trace >> events. This allows user space applications such as RAS Daemon to see the >> errors and report them however the user desires. This patchset extends the >> kernel functionality for RAS errors based on updates in the UEFI 2.6 and >> ACPI 6.1 specifications. > This series doesn't apply cleanly to v4.11-rc1, what did you base it on? > > Please base this on a v4.11 release candidate if you want it considered for v4.12. > This was based on 4.10, I will base it on 4.11-rc1 for the next patch set. Thanks, Tyler -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.