Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263354AbTETAdx (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 20:33:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263358AbTETAdx (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 20:33:53 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:31466 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263354AbTETAdw (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 20:33:52 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 17:46:36 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Dan Kegel Cc: Davide Libenzi , John Myers , linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Comparing the aio and epoll event frameworks. Message-ID: <20030520004636.GP2444@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Dan Kegel , Davide Libenzi , John Myers , linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200305192333.QAA12018@pagarcia.nscp.aoltw.net> <3EC9807D.3080804@kegel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EC9807D.3080804@kegel.com> Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 702 Lines: 19 Davide Libenzi wrote: >> Adding a single shot feature to epoll takes about 5 lines of code, >> comments included :) You know how many reuqests I had ? Zero, nada. On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 06:10:21PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > I thought edge triggered epoll *was* single-shot. > - Dan fs/eventpoll.c suggests "epoll" stands for "eventpoll" as opposed to "edge-triggered". Davide, did the LT additions prompt the renaming or was this always the case? -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/