From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Javi Merino <javi.merino@kernel.org>
Cc: airlied@linux.ie, C.Emde@osadl.org, linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Documentation/EDID fixes
In-Reply-To: <20170307163346.GA2255@ct-lt-587>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
References: <1488810456-4583-1-git-send-email-javi.merino@kernel.org> <87o9xdf4ek.fsf@intel.com> <20170307163346.GA2255@ct-lt-587>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 10:11:29 +0200
Message-ID: <87r328chn2.fsf@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1001
Lines: 25

On Tue, 07 Mar 2017, Javi Merino <javi.merino@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 06:16:51PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Mon, 06 Mar 2017, Javi Merino <javi.merino@kernel.org> wrote:
>> > I found these two minor issues while building an EDID.  I'm not sure
>> > whether the second patch (Add O= to support) is upstream material, but
>> > I'm sending it just in case.
>> 
>> I'm not opposed to fixing existing issues like this, but really I think
>> there should be an userspace tool for this. Definitely outside of the
>> Documentation directory, perhaps even outside the kernel tree
>> altogether.
>
> I am not sure whether this should be in the kernel or not, but I
> agree that Documentation/ doesn't look like the right place to build
> these files.

Just so there's no confusion: I'm just saying what I think should be
done in the long run. I'm not opposed to the fixes at hand, but someone
else needs to review them.

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center