Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753824AbdCHXgC (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:36:02 -0500
Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:50646 "EHLO
        out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751691AbdCHXgA (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:36:00 -0500
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Luis Henriques <henrix@camandro.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <jweiner@fb.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20170308184616.553hndqxd7lljqkq@charon>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 17:30:29 -0600
In-Reply-To: <20170308184616.553hndqxd7lljqkq@charon> (Luis Henriques's
        message of "Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:46:16 +0000")
Message-ID: <878tofl52i.fsf@xmission.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-XM-SPF: eid=1cll6z-0005Mm-MB;;;mid=<878tofl52i.fsf@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=67.3.234.240;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral
X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/t2Emj9kqj+7rbpk2LO8L4WGRIXMq+Bo8=
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.3.234.240
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com
X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
        *  0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address
        *  0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available.
        * -0.0 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40%
        *      [score: 0.3975]
        * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC
        *      [sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1]
        *  1.0 T_XMDrugObfuBody_12 obfuscated drug references
X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 
X-Spam-Combo: ;Luis Henriques <henrix@camandro.org>
X-Spam-Relay-Country: 
X-Spam-Timing: total 5334 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.10 (0.0%),
        signal_user_changed: 3.7 (0.1%), b_tie_ro: 2.3 (0.0%), parse: 1.25 (0.0%),
        extract_message_metadata: 30 (0.6%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.35 (0.0%),
        tests_pri_-1000: 11 (0.2%), tests_pri_-950: 2.3 (0.0%), tests_pri_-900: 1.78
        (0.0%), tests_pri_-400: 22 (0.4%), check_bayes: 20 (0.4%), b_tokenize: 7
        (0.1%), b_tok_get_all: 4.9 (0.1%), b_comp_prob: 3.0 (0.1%), b_tok_touch_all:
        2.2 (0.0%), b_finish: 0.85 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 300 (5.6%),
        check_dkim_signature: 2.1 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 7 (0.1%), tests_pri_500:
        4954 (92.9%), poll_dns_idle: 4937 (92.6%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%)
Subject: Re: NULL pointer dereference in cgroup
X-Spam-Flag: No
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 409
Lines: 16

Luis Henriques <henrix@camandro.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I've seen this only once, and can't reproduce it.  But here it is anyway:
>
> https://postimg.org/image/pn94k1yov
>
> (Not sure png files are accepted on LKML.)
>
> This occurred in a VM while booting 4.11.0-rc1

Any idea what was happening when you triggered this?  A little context
usually helps quite a bit when tracking things like this down.

Eric