Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932318AbdCINWc (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:22:32 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:35632 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932250AbdCINWa (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:22:30 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 14:22:25 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andrew Banman Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mike.travis@hpe.com, rja@hpe.com, sivanich@hpe.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/6] x86/platform/uv/BAU: UV4 message completion and initialization updates Message-ID: <20170309132225.GA27915@gmail.com> References: <1487369197-79054-1-git-send-email-abanman@hpe.com> <7b9ebd26-c623-807e-4786-8c6f79ed6909@hpe.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7b9ebd26-c623-807e-4786-8c6f79ed6909@hpe.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 594 Lines: 21 * Andrew Banman wrote: > Hi Ingo and Thomas, > > Are these patches acceptable to you? We want to get these upstream as soon > as possible, so please send along any more comments you have. If you're > annoyed by the format of the emails just let me know and I'll resubmit. > > Thank you, It's not entirely clear to me which are the latest patches (there were several v1/v2/v3 updates within the same discussion), so please re-send the latest against current -tip. I had a quick look and the patches appear to be OK, so I don't expect any big problems. Thanks, Ingo