Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932333AbdCJBpM (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2017 20:45:12 -0500 Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com ([221.176.66.79]:39037 "EHLO cmccmta1.chinamobile.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932252AbdCJBpK (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2017 20:45:10 -0500 X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee258c2051ca05-6f07c X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000 X-RM-TRANSID: 2eea58c2051b0b5-61a79 Subject: Re: how to unmap pages in an anonymous mmap? To: linux-mm@kvack.org References: <1487323472-20481-1-git-send-email-lixiubo@cmss.chinamobile.com> <09891673-0d95-8b66-ddce-0ace7aea43d1@redhat.com> <48b49493-4c82-3ed5-126f-2ea18c701242@cmss.chinamobile.com> <21d93bec-a717-5157-8dcf-cc629611572f@redhat.com> <85a41492-8aba-b752-c180-ec25f43d2a1a@cmss.chinamobile.com> Cc: Andy Grover , nab@linux-iscsi.org, mchristi@redhat.com, shli@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, sheng@yasker.org, namei.unix@gmail.com, bart.vanassche@sandisk.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jianfei Hu From: Xiubo Li Message-ID: <4f1d4fe7-7615-6034-9a63-068535b79e42@cmss.chinamobile.com> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:45:00 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2385 Lines: 63 On 2017年02月28日 03:32, Andy Grover wrote: > On 02/26/2017 09:59 PM, Xiubo Li wrote: >>> But, We likely don't want to release memory from the data area anyways >>> while active, in any case. How about if we set a timer when active >>> commands go to zero, and then reduce data area to some minimum if no new >>> cmds come in before timer expires? >> If I understand correctly: for example, we have 1G(as the minimum) >> data area and all blocks have been allocated and mapped to runner's >> vma, then we extern it to 1G + 256M as needed. When there have no >> active cmds and after the timer expires, will it reduce the data area >> back to 1G ? And then should it release the reduced 256M data area's >> memories ? >> >> If so, after kfree()ed the blocks' memories, it should also try to remove >> all the ptes which are mapping this page(like using the try_to_umap()), >> but something like try_to_umap() doesn't export for the modules. >> >> Without ummaping the kfree()ed pages' ptes mentioned above, then >> the reduced 256M vma space couldn't be reused again for the runner >> process, because the runner has already do the mapping for the reduced >> vma space to some old physical pages(won't trigger new page fault >> again). Then there will be a hole, and the hole will be bigger and bigger. >> >> Without ummaping the kfree()ed pages' ptes mentioned above, the >> pages' reference count (page_ref_dec(), which _inc()ed in page fault) >> couldn't be reduced back too. > Let's ask people who will know... > > Hi linux-mm, > > TCM-User (drivers/target/target_core_user.c) currently uses vmalloc()ed > memory to back a ring buffer that is mmaped by userspace. > > We want to move to dynamically mapping pages into this region, and also > we'd like to unmap/free pages when idle. What's the right way to unmap? > I see unmap_mapping_range() but that mentions an underlying file, which > TCMU doesn't have. Or maybe zap_page_range()? But it's not exported. Hi linux-mm For the TCMU case, the vm is not anonymous mapping. And still has device file desc: mmap(NULL, len, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, dev->fd, 0); If using the unmap_mapping_range() to do the dynamically maping, is it okay ? Any other potential risks ? Or the mentioned 'underlying file' is must one desk file ? Thanks very much, BRs Xiubo > Any advice? > > Thanks in advance -- Regards -- Andy