Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM: Emulate UMIP (or almost do so)
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
References: <1468351223-3250-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
 <F2CBF3009FA73547804AE4C663CAB28E3C31C1D8@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <0543af50-8961-38a7-1acc-aaefd4915dda@redhat.com>
 <58B68E91.4010400@linux.intel.com>
Cc: qian.ouyang@intel.com,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
From: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <58C25D7A.7070605@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:02:02 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <58B68E91.4010400@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1079
Lines: 35

On 3/1/2017 5:04 PM, Yu Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 12/13/2016 7:03 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> On 13/12/2016 05:03, Li, Liang Z wrote:
>>> Hi Paolo,
>>>
>>> We intended to enable UMIP for KVM and found you had already worked 
>>> on it.
>>> Do you have any plan for the following patch set? It's there 
>>> anything else you expect
>>> us help to do?
>> Yes, I plan to resend these patches for 4.11.
>
> Hi Paolo,
>
>   Previously we saw your RFC patches of UMIP sent out, and we would 
> like to try some unit test in Intel. I found a patch written by you in 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9225929/, guess this is for the kvm 
> unit test(though I failed to git apply it directly).
>   And I wonder, when will it be integrated to kvm unit test repo?
>   Besides, is this all the test for UMIP unit test? I.e. do we need to 
> construct a scenario in the test to trigger vm exit and let hypervisor 
> inject a GP fault? - I did not see this scenario in this patch. Or any 
> other suggestions? :-)
>

Hi Paolo, any suggestions?
Sorry for the disturb. :)

Yu
> Thanks
> Yu
>