Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932165AbdCJI1v (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2017 03:27:51 -0500 Received: from mail-ve1eur01on0048.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.1.48]:23410 "EHLO EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755176AbdCJI1t (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2017 03:27:49 -0500 From: Jun Li To: Baolin Wang CC: NeilBrown , Felipe Balbi , Greg KH , Sebastian Reichel , "Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov" , David Woodhouse , "robh@kernel.org" , Marek Szyprowski , Ruslan Bilovol , "Peter Chen" , Alan Stern , "grygorii.strashko@ti.com" , Yoshihiro Shimoda , Lee Jones , "Mark Brown" , John Stultz , "Charles Keepax" , "patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" , Linux PM list , USB , "device-mainlining@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , LKML Subject: RE: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation Thread-Topic: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation Thread-Index: AQHSi1aOUyaKEwWPx0aHt9CEJ1a6daGCc4sAgAbC/YCAApaxcIAAU+eAgAAHFACAAFACAIAA+GrQgABUz4CAAAzoUA== Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:27:45 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87zih3m73h.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: linaro.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;linaro.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=nxp.com; x-originating-ip: [199.59.226.141] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: fea86f9b-1eb7-489f-a638-08d4678f53f9 x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001)(48565401081);SRVR:AM5PR04MB2963; x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;AM5PR04MB2963;7:Tp5KF2naTbVoEtXlmlghHICvZDGxrxx6fAlYF+BrZ6meFwS0J/ROw2E+qsiJrm1XnyuWqSSMUBQRqKQCZTNLwkER16NRaC4GjyV5bqz5dK0CHa6Y0QJJpP8TSTCP9JuGapSR7mVumVscv495S0dKrE55fZZVqg6mz2U30iA22h646MSFZ6B4hu750nlQJ0mbQH9IK9fGrqslSQCvCXl+Irz2AE3aOFjY1GNuyKFqGka31C5Mrt36Gjzt66FfhmrdYpMBFeu5cY/CnAI7nW4BMvgFhkTyUXd8ztZ22fR8T19/Mbdp9bFiX8jqEcZ1CRQXK5czhwHkaYuGTghdOzmw4g== x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(31051911155226)(9452136761055)(35073007944872)(185117386973197)(101931422205132)(35762410373642)(7411616537696); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(20161123560025)(20161123558025)(20161123555025)(6072148);SRVR:AM5PR04MB2963;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AM5PR04MB2963; x-forefront-prvs: 02426D11FE x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(39840400002)(39860400002)(39450400003)(39410400002)(39850400002)(377454003)(13464003)(24454002)(66066001)(2906002)(86362001)(54356999)(7696004)(189998001)(50986999)(102836003)(5660300001)(6116002)(305945005)(33656002)(122556002)(7416002)(7736002)(76176999)(3846002)(6246003)(110136004)(38730400002)(74316002)(39060400002)(9686003)(2900100001)(54906002)(4326008)(8676002)(99286003)(8936002)(55016002)(229853002)(77096006)(53546006)(81166006)(6506006)(6436002)(25786008)(53936002)(93886004)(6916009)(2950100002)(97736004)(106116001)(3660700001)(3280700002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:AM5PR04MB2963;H:AM5PR04MB2961.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:ovrnspm;PTR:InfoNoRecords;LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: nxp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Mar 2017 08:27:45.1843 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 686ea1d3-bc2b-4c6f-a92c-d99c5c301635 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5PR04MB2963 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id v2A8RuWP015878 Content-Length: 6114 Lines: 144 Hi > -----Original Message----- > From: Baolin Wang [mailto:baolin.wang@linaro.org] > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 3:15 PM > To: Jun Li > Cc: NeilBrown ; Felipe Balbi ; Greg KH > ; Sebastian Reichel ; Dmitry > Eremin-Solenikov ; David Woodhouse > ; robh@kernel.org; Marek Szyprowski > ; Ruslan Bilovol ; > Peter Chen ; Alan Stern > ; grygorii.strashko@ti.com; Yoshihiro Shimoda > ; Lee Jones ; > Mark Brown ; John Stultz ; > Charles Keepax ; > patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; Linux PM list pm@vger.kernel.org>; USB ; device- > mainlining@lists.linuxfoundation.org; LKML > Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with > the usb gadget power negotation > > On 10 March 2017 at 14:30, Jun Li wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > Will generic phy need add extcon as well? > >> >> > >> >> Yes, will add a 'struct extcon_dev*' in 'struct usb_phy', which > >> >> will be common code. > >> >> > >> > > >> > I mean the common code need add 'struct extcon_dev' into both > >> > 'struct phy' and 'struct usb_phy', right? as some/new usb phy use > >> > that generic phy > >> driver. > >> > >> Ah, you remind me. Seems we need also add one 'struct extcon_dev' > >> into 'struct phy'. > >> > >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> Secondly, I also agreed with Peter's comments: Not only USB > >> >> >> >> PHY to register an extcon, but also for the drivers which > >> >> >> >> can detect USB charger type, it may be USB controller > >> >> >> >> driver, USB type-c driver, pmic driver, and these drivers > >> >> >> >> may not have an extcon device since the internal part can finish > the vbus detect. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Whichever part can detect vbus, the driver for that part must > >> >> >> > be able to find the extcon and trigger a notification. > >> >> >> > Maybe one part can detect VBUS, another can measure the > >> >> >> > resistance on ID and a third can work through the state > >> >> >> > machine to determine if D+ and D- are shorted together. > >> >> >> > Somehow these three need to work together to determine what > >> >> >> > is > >> >> >> plugged > >> >> >> > in to the external connection port. Somewhere there much an > >> 'extcon' > >> >> >> > device which represents that port and which the three devices > >> >> >> > can find and can interact with. > >> >> >> > I think it makes sense for the usb_phy to be the connection point. > >> >> >> > Each of the devices can get to the phy, and the phy can get > >> >> >> > to the > >> >> extcon. > >> >> >> > It doesn't matter very much if the usb phy driver creates the > >> >> >> > extcon, or if something else creates the extcon and the phy > >> >> >> > driver performs a lookup to find it (e.g. based on devicetree info). > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > The point is that there is obviously an external physical > >> >> >> > connection, and so there should be an 'extcon' device that > >> represents it. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Peter & Jun, is it OK for you every phy has one extcon device > >> >> >> to receive VBUS notification, especially for detecting the > >> >> >> charger type by > >> >> software? > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > My understanding is phy/usb_phy as the connection point, will > >> >> > send the notification to PMIC driver which actually control the > >> >> > charge current, also this will be done in your common framework, > right? > >> >> > >> >> Not in USB charger framework. If we are all agree every usb_phy > >> >> can register one extcon device, can get correct charger type and > >> >> send out correct vbus_draw information, then we don't need USB > >> >> charger framework as Neil suggested. So this will be okay for your > >> >> case (especially for detecting the charger type by software) ? > >> > > >> > In my case, charger detection is done by controller driver and I > >> > need do charger type detection internally, and only pass the > >> > current draw info via phy which will send out, this seems ok for > >> > me, but I think it will be good if you or someone can show us an > >> > example user based on the > >> design Neil suggested. > >> > Will you work out that common code if this USB charger framework is > >> > not > >> needed? > >> > >> I will add a 'struct extcon_dev*' in 'struct usb_phy' and struct > >> phy“. Others are already ready if everyone has no complain about > >> current design, except > > > > Only adding extcon_dev into usb_phy/phy and all others are ready? > > My understanding you will also do: > > - We need find a central place to send the notification(phy common part). > > That will include these implementation when adding extcon_dev. > OK, thanks. > > - If the extcon_dev is directly added in usb_phy/phy, PMIC needs some > API to findup it. > > PMIC can find extcon device by phandle. extcon_dev(not a reference pointer) is directly added in usb_phy/phy, not via devicetree, how PMIC find it by phandle? > > > > >> my one concern. (I am afraid if it is enough to send out vbus draw > >> information from USB phy driver, for example you will miss super > >> speed (900mA), which need get the speed information from gadget > >> driver.) > >> > > > > Can we handle this in USB(so has super speed information) and just > > send out 900mA directly? > > From Neil's suggestion, we only have one place to send out current > information from usb phy, so I have this concern and doubt if we still need > the USB charger framework. So if put it in phy/usb_phy, this is a problem, that only one place should have the infor of both speed and usb state, how about put it at usb_gadget, then, e.g. send the notification in usb_gadget_vbus_connect()? Li Jun > > -- > Baolin.wang > Best Regards