Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964844AbdCJKXQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2017 05:23:16 -0500 Received: from conssluserg-05.nifty.com ([210.131.2.90]:54314 "EHLO conssluserg-05.nifty.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935365AbdCJKXL (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2017 05:23:11 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-05.nifty.com v2AAMgpK008608 X-Nifty-SrcIP: [209.85.161.180] MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170310201702.47b0a523@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20170310201702.47b0a523@canb.auug.org.au> From: Masahiro Yamada Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 19:22:41 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Kbuild maintainership To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Michal Marek , Linux Kbuild mailing list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 536 Lines: 23 Hi Stephen, 2017-03-10 18:17 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell : > I assume that I will get a request to change the kbuild-current and > kbuilt trees in linux-next soon. In the meantime, should I remove the > current ones? > > No rush though since I am on leave next week. I had already dropped an email onto your address privately. (Maybe, are you checking the ML, but not your mailbox yet?) Anyway, no need to rush. When you get back to work, please adjust linux-next. Thanks! -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada