Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262098AbTEUN20 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2003 09:28:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262095AbTEUN20 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2003 09:28:26 -0400 Received: from stine.vestdata.no ([195.204.68.10]:4576 "EHLO stine.vestdata.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262093AbTEUN2X (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2003 09:28:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 15:41:20 +0200 From: Ragnar =?iso-8859-15?Q?Kj=F8rstad?= To: "Michael S. Peek" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, peek@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Questions about LARGE, RAID storage under Linux Message-ID: <20030521134120.GQ7706@vestdata.no> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2542 Lines: 58 On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 12:15:39PM -0400, Michael S. Peek wrote: > I am looking at using a hardware RAID device that appears to it's SCSI host as > a single large drive. I am well aware that I can break this device down into > multiple LUNS, but if possible I need to keep it as one big drive. I > understand from the Linux Info Sheet, last updated in 1998 according to it's > text, that Linux is able to handle partitions up to 4TB in size. What is the Linux Info Sheet? AFAIK linux has never had a partition-limit of 4 TB. There is a limit in any block-device of 2^32 sectors, typically 2 TB. Some drivers may have sign-issues, leaving you with only 2^31 sectors (1 TB). > What I want to know is: > > (a) Is 4TB still the maximum limitation on a single partition size? If not, > what is the current maximum? > > (b) Would this maximum partition size still apply when using the software RAID > tools to combine two or more of these devices together? I believe the 2.4 kernel is still limited to 2 TB for both scsi-devices and virtual block-devices such as md or lvm. I think 2.5 has an option added for large block devices. This should allow you to use both scsi-devices and md virtual devices larger than 2TB. It may depend on changes in the actual scsi-drivers, so possible it only works for a subset of scsi-adapters. Last time I checked it didn't enable larger LVM-volumes, so you're limited to md for virtual devices. > What I am looking for is the ability to mount and format an external SCSI > device that's 3.5TB in size. (It's a Promise UltraTrak RM1500 w/ 15 x 250GB > drives). I want to be able to upgrade the hard drives at a later date and > know that the Linux box to which it is attached will still be able to handle > them. Ideally, I would like to purchase a second (or even a third) device > later down the road and use software RAID to concatenate them together. I think you would want to use LVM to concatenate them together, and AFAIK that is not yet possible. There is work in progress though. I think your best chances of making this work in the future without having to reformat your system is to use LVM2 with a large physical extentsize from the start. My information may be out of date, so take this with a grain of salt. -- Ragnar Kj?rstad Zet.no - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/